The Prevalence and Correlates of Lifetime Psychiatric Disorders and Trauma Exposures in Urban and Rural Settings: Results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R)

Abstract

IntroductionDistinctions between rural and urban environments produce different frequencies of traumatic exposures and psychiatric disorders. We examine the prevalence of psychiatric disorders and frequency of trauma exposures by position on the rural-urban continuum.MethodsThe National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R) was used to evaluate psychiatric disorders among a nationally-representative sample of the U.S. population. Rurality was designated using the Department of Agriculture's 2003 rural-urban continuum codes (RUCC), which differentiate counties into levels of rurality by population density and adjacency to metropolitan areas. Lifetime psychiatric disorders included post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety disorders, major depressive disorder, mood disorders, impulse-control disorders, and substance abuse. Trauma exposures were classified as war-related, accident-related, disaster-related, interpersonal or other. Weighted logistic regression models examined the odds of psychiatric disorders and trauma exposures by position on the rural-urban continuum, adjusted for relevant covariates.Results75% of participants were metropolitan, 12.2% were suburban, and 12.8% were from rural counties. The most common disorder reported was any anxiety disorder (38.5%). Drug abuse was more common among metropolitan (8.7%, p = 0.018), compared to nonmetropolitan (5.1% suburban, 6.1% rural) participants. A one-category increase in rurality was associated with decreased odds for war-related trauma (aOR = 0.86, 95%CI 0.78–0.95). Rurality was not associated with risk for any other lifetime psychiatric disorders or trauma exposure.Discussion/ConclusionsContrary to the expectation of some rural primary care providers, the frequencies of most psychiatric disorders and trauma exposures are similar across the rural-urban continuum, reinforcing calls to improve mental healthcare access in resource-poor rural communities.

Prevalence and Distribution Pattern of Mood Swings in Thai Adolescents: School-based Survey

“…That the location of the school in the metropolitan area increased the odds of MS is supported by previous studies in Western and Asian countries where higher odds of mental problems were found in metropolitan and semi-rural areas than rural areas [37]. The reality of health problems and mental health problems in urban areas may be related to harmful social fragmentation and having low social capital-behavior networks among people [37]. The current study showed that schools in Bangkok had the highest frequency of MS.…”

Pesticide exposure and hepatocellular carcinoma risk: A case-control study using a geographic information system (GIS) to link SEER-Medicare and California pesticide data

“…After intersecting TIGER/Line© counties and ZIP Codes in a GIS (ZIP Code was matched to county comprising the majority of its area), county RUCC codes were assigned to each study subject according to their mode ZIP Code. RUCC codes were categorized into three groups: urban (RUCC codes 0–3; metropolitan areas of <250,000 to >1 million population), rural ≥20,000 population (4–5), and rural <20,000 population (6–9) (McCall-Hosenfeld et al, 2014). Rural/urban residential status was assumed to be constant regardless of state boundaries.…”

Life Course Epidemiology of Trauma and Related Psychopathology in Civilian Populations

“…First, particular environments (e.g., neighborhoods) increase the likelihood of exposure to trauma and adversity. Importantly, this effect is more specific than urban versus rural [75], but particular to neighborhoods and high risk intra-urban areas [76-78]. Second, an initial trauma initiates a chain of risk whereby a cascade of adversity may follow [79, 80].…”