2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00380-004-0789-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The prevalence and clinical predictors of atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis in patients undergoing coronary angiography

Abstract: Renal artery stenosis is an important cause of secondary hypertension as well as ischemic nephropathy. The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical predictors in patients with renal artery stenosis in a population referred for coronary angiography. From March 1998 to July 1999, 1459 patients undergoing coronary angiography for various indications were routinely screened for renal artery stenosis by undergoing abdominal aortography. Coronary angiography, carotid angiography, and abdominal aortography… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
26
1
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
26
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We performed systematic RA in consecutive AMI patients, regardless of other risk factors suggesting RAS (severe hypertension, PAD, or abdominal bruits). Data showed concordant values of RAS prevalence in AMI (16.6%) to those reported in well‐recognized risk groups (suspected renovascular hypertension5, 30—14.1%, hypertension and diabetes mellitus31—17.1%, chronic CAD5, 32, 33—9.1% to 10.8%) but lower values than in patients with chronic heart failure34—54.1%, aortic abdominal aneurysm35—38%, end‐stage renal disease36—40.8%. Differences between reports are driven by inclusion of patients with different stages of atheromatous disease and inflammation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…We performed systematic RA in consecutive AMI patients, regardless of other risk factors suggesting RAS (severe hypertension, PAD, or abdominal bruits). Data showed concordant values of RAS prevalence in AMI (16.6%) to those reported in well‐recognized risk groups (suspected renovascular hypertension5, 30—14.1%, hypertension and diabetes mellitus31—17.1%, chronic CAD5, 32, 33—9.1% to 10.8%) but lower values than in patients with chronic heart failure34—54.1%, aortic abdominal aneurysm35—38%, end‐stage renal disease36—40.8%. Differences between reports are driven by inclusion of patients with different stages of atheromatous disease and inflammation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Similar differences in groups have been found in other studies. [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] The higher rate of RAS among patients with a history of CABG in our study and that of Cohen et al 19 reflects a higher prevalence among patients with multi-vessel CAD. This finding may certify that RAS is a manifestation of diffuse atherosclerosis and has a higher prevalence in those with CAD and PAD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Among severe RAS patients with differentiated vessel involvement, the prevalence was 16.6, 20.1 and 38.2%, respectively. In the study of Park et al, 13 the prevalence of significant RAS ranged from 19.6% in patients with 1-VD to 41.8% in those with 3-VD. Similar differences in groups have been found in other studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations