2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2020.105317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The preservation of ancient DNA in archaeological fish bone

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The modern reads were aligned as described above for the Heliconius butterflies. Ancient herring reads were aligned as described in Ferrari et al (2021), using BWA-aln, which is commonly held to be the most appropriate mode for aligning ancient genome sequences (Schubert et al, 2012).…”
Section: Atlantic Herringmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The modern reads were aligned as described above for the Heliconius butterflies. Ancient herring reads were aligned as described in Ferrari et al (2021), using BWA-aln, which is commonly held to be the most appropriate mode for aligning ancient genome sequences (Schubert et al, 2012).…”
Section: Atlantic Herringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, recent strategies targeting organelle (mitochondrial or chloroplast) reference databases increasingly use genome skimming sequencing approaches (Bohmann et al, 2020). Finally, DNA preservation in subfossil, archaeological, historical, or degraded biological material remains variable and is often context‐specific (Ferrari et al, 2021; Keighley et al, 2021; Tin et al, 2014). In order to account for such unpredictability, ancient DNA sequencing studies typically screen many specimens, from which a subset with the best DNA preservation is selected for deeper sequencing (e.g., Martínez‐García et al, 2021; Star et al, 2018; van der Valk et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNA extraction and library preparation from ancient samples were performed in the aDNA laboratory at the University of Oslo under rigorous measures (Cooper and Poinar, 2000;Gilbert et al, 2005). All ancient samples were processed with the same DNA extraction and library protocols according to Ferrari et al (2021). In short, bones were UV-treated for 10 min per side and pulverized using a stainless-steel mortar (Gondek et al, 2018).…”
Section: Dna Extraction Amplification and Sequencingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to provide a long-term perspective on fishing exploitation impacts, the use of archeological evidence, such as fish bone remains, is essential for those periods for which little or no historical data are available. Recent developments in whole genome aDNA methods now allow the inference of demographic histories and the estimation of genetic fluctuations over time from fishbone samples (Oosting et al, 2019;Ferrari et al, 2021). Such combined molecular analyses of historical and modern samples can potentially provide an understanding of the association between human-environmental impact and population declines (Hofman et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, palaeogenomic analysis is far less frequently applied to marine populations, particularly those heavily exploited by humans, both past and present (Oosting et al, 2019). In the last few years, the use of ancient marine samples has begun to increase as laboratory techniques for such samples have improved (Boessenkool et al, 2017;Der Sarkissian et al, 2020;Ferrari et al, 2021b;Martínez-García et al, 2021).…”
Section: Palaeogenomicsmentioning
confidence: 99%