1996
DOI: 10.1016/0370-2693(96)00733-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The present theoretical error on the Bhabha scattering cross section in the luminometry region at LEP

Abstract: 7 pagesThe results concerning the theoretical evaluation of the small-angle Bhabha Scattering cross section obtained during the Workshop on Physics at LEP2 (CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, 1995) by the Working Group ``Event Generators for Bhabha Scattering'' are summarized. The estimate of the theoretical error on the cross section in the luminometry region is updated

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
36
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
3
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is the main reason we will be able to reduce the estimated precision of the BHLUMI4.04 prediction in comparison to Ref. 2,4 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is the main reason we will be able to reduce the estimated precision of the BHLUMI4.04 prediction in comparison to Ref. 2,4 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…With this as our primary motivation, we have examined the error budget arrived at in Refs. 2,4,5 in view of recent exact results impacting both the technical and physical precision of the errors quoted in that budget.…”
Section: Currently New Luminometers At Lepmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11] and its summary published in Ref. [12]) the present program BHLUMI 4.04 features a precision of 0.11% for the best LEP luminometers at the scattering angles 1…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10] in connection with the respective O(α 2 )L corrections needed for the 0.061% (0.054%) total precision tag achieved in Ref. [11] for the LEP1/SLC luminosity process in the Monte Carlo event generator BHLUMI4.04 in Ref. [12].…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 93%