“…The obtained articles were reviewed by two authors and confirm with a third person. As mentioned in Table 1, the results examined for risk of bias for studies based on the MMAT, all studies had an acceptable quality for inclusion in the study and according to the "quantitative non-randomized" part of the checklist, eight studies had a low risk of bias [18,19,25,40,41,47,50,52], 27 studies had a moderate risk of bias [5-11, 16, 17, 22-24, 26, 28, 29, 33, 34, 36, 38, 39, 43-46, 48, 49, 51], and five studies had a high risk of bias [27,30,35,37,42].…”