1993
DOI: 10.1016/0304-4017(93)90027-k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The presence of an early L4 larvae population in relation to the immune response of calves against Ostertagia ostertagi

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
10
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
5
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The infection dynamics shown in Figure 1 match the findings of Roberts and Grenfell [7], and the trends echo empirical data [47][50], with peak parasite burdens within realistic bounds [30], [47], [53]. The model also reproduces the grazing behaviours empirically observed at multiple scales in livestock grazing systems [40], [17], [54], [23] At the start of the grazing season, infection is initiated through ingestion of infective larvae that have over-wintered on pasture.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The infection dynamics shown in Figure 1 match the findings of Roberts and Grenfell [7], and the trends echo empirical data [47][50], with peak parasite burdens within realistic bounds [30], [47], [53]. The model also reproduces the grazing behaviours empirically observed at multiple scales in livestock grazing systems [40], [17], [54], [23] At the start of the grazing season, infection is initiated through ingestion of infective larvae that have over-wintered on pasture.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Using values outlined in the main parameterisation section, the model successfully reproduces the parasite dynamics empirically observed in livestock grazing systems [7], [47][50]. The introduction of susceptible hosts onto contaminated pasture accounts for the rapid increase in ingested larvae and adult parasites in the host, and the subsequent acquisition of immunity accounts for the consequent decline in parasite burden (Figure 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another possibility is that the young adults emerging from the abomasai glands (causing epithelial disruption and inflammation) provide the continuous antigenic stimulus necessary for development of immunity, rather than the arrested larvae per se. This could explain why in the present experiment a reduction in Ostertagia worm burden (although not significant) was only observed in calves which maintained elevated pepsinogen levels until the end of the primary infection period, while in the study of Hilderson et al (1993) worm burdens were not reduced after a decrease of pepsinogen levels from day 67 onwards.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…Therefore, the levels of antibodies and pepsinogen after the primary infection period could be used indirectly to predict whether or not animals had acquired immunity. In contrast, in an experiment with an identical infection schedule for 18 weeks (Hilderson et al, 1993), a decrease of pepsinogen levels from day 67 onwards, indicating that fewer worms reached the adult stage, was interpreted as a sign of developing immunity. This was not confirmed by a reduction in worm burdens after challenge, although a higher percentage of worms were inhibited L 4 larvae.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%