2017
DOI: 10.1163/9789004346109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Prehistory of the Balto-Slavic Accent

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relevant assumptions are the following (cf. Leskien ; Stang : 116; Pronk : 235–8; Hill : 47–8; similarly Hock : 378–80; Jasanoff : 9; : 100–1): acute monophthongs are always shortened at the end of a word; and acute diphthongs are shortened at the end of polysyllabic words but remain diphthongs in monosyllabic words, changing their intonation from acute to circumflex. …”
Section: East Baltic Preverbs: the Case Of Highland Lithuanianmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The relevant assumptions are the following (cf. Leskien ; Stang : 116; Pronk : 235–8; Hill : 47–8; similarly Hock : 378–80; Jasanoff : 9; : 100–1): acute monophthongs are always shortened at the end of a word; and acute diphthongs are shortened at the end of polysyllabic words but remain diphthongs in monosyllabic words, changing their intonation from acute to circumflex. …”
Section: East Baltic Preverbs: the Case Of Highland Lithuanianmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prosodic system of Latvian is known to have experienced a series of innovations alien to Lithuanian (cf. Endzelin : 17–32; Stang : 138–43; Petit : 64–71; Jasanoff : 62–4). Due to these changes, in Latvian the phonetic realization of the inherited intonations acute and circumflex differs from their Lithuanian realization.…”
Section: East Baltic Preverbs: the Case Of Highland Lithuanianmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This rule explains many cases of re lexes indicating long vowels in phonological and morphological environments where they would not otherwise be expected. The law is widely accepted (Jasanoff 2017), sometimes with additional restrictions on the conditioning environment (e.g. Shintani 1985;Rasmussen 1992;Matasović1995).…”
Section: Winter's Lawmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are some exceptions to the rule as originally formulated, which Winter himself acknowledges. Various proposals have been made to limit the rule to particular environments based on segments or prosody, though none of these revisions have been fully accepted, and all of these formulations still have some exceptions that they do not capture (Jasanoff 2017). Shintani (1985) proposed that the lengthening only took place in unstressed pretonic syllables; this formulation is largely accepted and partially revised by Rasmussen (1992), who also provides further examples supporting the law.…”
Section: Winter's Lawmentioning
confidence: 99%