2022
DOI: 10.1055/a-2003-8885
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Preferred Reconstructive Choice for a Lower Third Tibial Exposure Defect: An Online Survey of 356 Microsurgeons

Abstract: Background One of the most challenging yet common areas in reconstructive surgery is the closure of defects in the lower leg. Surgeons have can choose from several reconstructive options options for the closure of soft tissue defects of the lower leg, including local and free flaps. The aim of this study was to understand the reconstructive strategy for lower leg defects of different microsurgeons around the world by harnessing the power of social media and online questionnaires. Methods A studied case of a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
(48 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…18 Although some surgeons consider free tissue transfer a standard treatment option, controversies persist regarding wounds in the distal third of the leg that are either too small for free flap surgery or too large for primary suturing. 21,22 The increasing pattern of using fasciocutaneous perforator flaps provides more alternatives for lower limb reconstruction. 20,23 In our study, we have developed an algorithm influenced by previous studies and known management protocols, and taking into account the available services and materials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 Although some surgeons consider free tissue transfer a standard treatment option, controversies persist regarding wounds in the distal third of the leg that are either too small for free flap surgery or too large for primary suturing. 21,22 The increasing pattern of using fasciocutaneous perforator flaps provides more alternatives for lower limb reconstruction. 20,23 In our study, we have developed an algorithm influenced by previous studies and known management protocols, and taking into account the available services and materials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%