1962
DOI: 10.1016/0006-291x(62)90339-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The preferential inhibition by chloramphenicol of induced enzyme synthesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
23
1

Year Published

1966
1966
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in accordance with the data on the inhibition of the ,B-lactamase production by other antibacterial drugs that inhibit protein synthesis (1,7,13,14,18). On the other hand, we found the same percentage of experiments in which subMIC's of the drugs increased the penicillinase production.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is in accordance with the data on the inhibition of the ,B-lactamase production by other antibacterial drugs that inhibit protein synthesis (1,7,13,14,18). On the other hand, we found the same percentage of experiments in which subMIC's of the drugs increased the penicillinase production.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Only a few papers have dealt with the effects of the subMIC on bacterial enzymatic systems. Inducible enzymes were shown to be affected by the subMIC's of nitrofurans (7) and chloramphenicol (18). Gemmell has reported the influence of the subMIC's of antibiotics, especially .clindamycin, on the biosynthesis of some staphylococcal toxins and enzymes during experimental pyogenic infection (5).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…system (Sypherd, Strauss & Treffers, 1962), where the antibiotics act by inhibiting the inducer-promoted synthesis of rnessenger-RNA (Sypherd & Strauss, 1963 (Fig. 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data presented here, at least for the prevention of competence development produced by chloramphenicol, implies that the attainment of the competent state by Haemophilur influenzae organisms may be the result of the induction of an enzyme or protein (Sypherd, Strauss & Treffers, 1962;Weber & DeMoss, 1966). It is believed that the function of this protein is to activate or modify pre-existing DNA binding sites that are produced by the metabolism of inosine and lactate during phase-1 (Ranhand & Lichstein, 1966).…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%