2014
DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afu151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The predictive value of gait speed and maximum step length for falling in community-dwelling older persons

Abstract: Maximum step length and gait speed as single-item tools do not have sufficient power to predict future falls in community-dwelling older persons.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
14
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study used the standard AUC >0.70, which is used in clinical practice. 26 , 27 Therefore, TUGT can be an effective, simple, and practical tool to predict future recurrent falls in elderly people. This study also did confirm the earlier findings that TUGT is better in predicting recurrent falls, and adding age and gender to the model increases the predictive ability of TUGT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study used the standard AUC >0.70, which is used in clinical practice. 26 , 27 Therefore, TUGT can be an effective, simple, and practical tool to predict future recurrent falls in elderly people. This study also did confirm the earlier findings that TUGT is better in predicting recurrent falls, and adding age and gender to the model increases the predictive ability of TUGT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7–10 Predictive studies linking MSL to fall risk are still limited 911 GS proved to be a feasible and valid measure to predict future adverse events, such as disability and falls, in community-dwelling older persons 11–19. An important limitation of most of these studies was that only a single-baseline MSL or GS measurement was assessed by a professional in a clinical setting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 11 GS proved to be a feasible and valid measure to predict future adverse events, such as disability and falls, in community-dwelling older persons. [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] An important limitation of most of these studies was that only a single-baseline MSL or GS measurement was assessed by a professional in a clinical setting. It can be reasoned that mobility assessment at only one time point may preclude identification of a large proportion of the persons at risk as they may experience a rapid or gradual decline in mobility and balance over time, and may or may not pass in due time a population-based cut-off point.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although previous studies have proved these three tests may be correlated with fall risk, it hard to identify a single test that can predict the multiple factors involved in falls, and there are also studies that suggest a single tool does not have sufficient power to predict falls in independently living senior adults 8 16 . Specific diseases and impairments may also affect specific aspects of function, which may then determine the characteristics of an individual’s likelihood of falling.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%