1997
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1997.tb07453.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The predictive value of cranial ultrasound and of somatosensory evoked potentials after nerve stimulation for adverse neurological outcome in preterm infants

Abstract: Thirty‐nine preterm infants were studied to compare the predictive value of somatosensory evoked responses (SEPs) following median‐nerve and posterior tibial‐nerve stimulation with the predictive value of cranial ultrasound. With regard to the SEP, a normal median‐nerve response was by no means a guarantee of a normal outcome. A normal posterior tibial‐nerve response, however, almost guaranteed a normal outcome, but the test was very time consuming and the number of false positive responses was high (sensitivi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
26
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…All studies except one were based at tertiary neonatal units. Three studies reporting a high prevalence of CP were included and were explainable by biased population selection from high‐risk groups …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All studies except one were based at tertiary neonatal units. Three studies reporting a high prevalence of CP were included and were explainable by biased population selection from high‐risk groups …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Possible injury to the thalamo-cortical connections due to periventricular pathology has also motivated a wealth of SEP studies in preterm infants to assess the predictive value of abnormal (absent or delayed depending on the study) median nerve sep MN 30 (usually referred to as N1 in the literature; Klimach and Cooke, 1988b; Willis et al, 1989; de Vries et al, 1992; Pierrat et al, 1997) and the earliest posterior tibial nerve SEP (referred to as P1) from SI for future cerebral palsy (CP) (White and Cooke, 1994; Pierrat et al, 1997; Pike and Marlow, 2000). Results have been, however, somewhat contradictory, with specificity, sensitivity, and positive and negative predictive values varying markedly between studies.…”
Section: Early Brain Insults and Somatosensory System Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In preterm infants, both median nerve and posterior tibial nerve SEPs have been evaluated for their value in predicting future cerebral palsy (CP). The sensitivity of abnormal median-nerve SEPs to predict CP has ranged from 13 to 100%, with a specificity of 87-100% (Klimach and Cooke, 1988b;Willis et al, 1989;Majnemer et al, 1990;De Vries et al, 1992;Pierrat et al, 1997), whereas respective values for abnormal tibial nerve SEPs have been 63-96% for sensitivity and 50-99% for specificity (White and Cooke, 1994;Pierrat et al, 1997;Pike and Marlow, 2000). Many SEP studies have experienced technical difficulties in reliably recording the responses, particularly in the youngest preterm infants (Klimach and Cooke, 1988a;Smit et al, 1998Smit et al, , 2000.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%