2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00787-018-1226-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The predictive validity of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire for child attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

Abstract: We need accurate screening measures for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) to ensure that children with the disorder are referred for assessment without raising concern for children with normal behaviour. The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) provides hyperactivity-inattention (HI), conduct, emotional and peer problem subscales and impact scores that may be used for screening. The aim of the study was to investigate the predictive validity of the Danish version of the parent SDQ HI su… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Five subscores were defined based on five out of the 25 items and corresponded to the following behavioral categories; “hyperactivity/inattention,” “emotional symptoms,” “conduct problems,” “peer relationship problems,” and “prosocial behavior” as developed by Goodman et al (31). The hyperactivity/inattention subscale is a valid predictor of clinically diagnosed ADHD (32) and is composed of five items (“Restless, overactive, cannot stay still for long”; “Constantly fidgeting or squirming”; “Easily distracted, concentration wanders”; “Thinks things out before acting”; and “Sees tasks through to the end, good attention span”) addressing the three core symptoms of ADHD diagnosis criteria according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders—Fourth Edition (DSM-IV—American Psychiatric Association, 1994), namely inattention and hyperactivity/impulsiveness behavior (26).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five subscores were defined based on five out of the 25 items and corresponded to the following behavioral categories; “hyperactivity/inattention,” “emotional symptoms,” “conduct problems,” “peer relationship problems,” and “prosocial behavior” as developed by Goodman et al (31). The hyperactivity/inattention subscale is a valid predictor of clinically diagnosed ADHD (32) and is composed of five items (“Restless, overactive, cannot stay still for long”; “Constantly fidgeting or squirming”; “Easily distracted, concentration wanders”; “Thinks things out before acting”; and “Sees tasks through to the end, good attention span”) addressing the three core symptoms of ADHD diagnosis criteria according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders—Fourth Edition (DSM-IV—American Psychiatric Association, 1994), namely inattention and hyperactivity/impulsiveness behavior (26).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SDQ-hyperactivity/Inattention questionnaire is composed of five items (total scores obtainable ranges: 0-10). A score ≥7 points was used to classify children with abnormal hyperactivity/inattention (Goodman 1997) and suspected ADHD (Overgaard et al 2019). Finally, the ADHD-DSM-IV questionnaire consists of 18 symptoms categorized into two separate groups: inattention (9 symptoms) and hyperactivity/ impulsivity (9 symptoms).…”
Section: Environmental Health Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have further shown that the SDQ has good predictive validity, for diagnoses of ADHD [29,30] and other mental disorders [22,23,31]. The pre-school version of the scale, which we use in the current study, has previously been validated in the MCS [21].…”
Section: Children's Socioemotional Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 90%