The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2022
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.838454
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Predictive Role of Low Spatial Frequencies in Automatic Face Processing: A Visual Mismatch Negativity Investigation

Abstract: Visual processing is thought to function in a coarse-to-fine manner. Low spatial frequencies (LSF), conveying coarse information, would be processed early to generate predictions. These LSF-based predictions would facilitate the further integration of high spatial frequencies (HSF), conveying fine details. The predictive role of LSF might be crucial in automatic face processing, where high performance could be explained by an accurate selection of clues in early processing. In the present study, we used a visu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that when face and car images are sufficiently distorted the model ceases to output waveforms comparable with those in the training data. It is not unreasonable to suspect that changes to the appearance of images might similarly influence ERP waveforms [32][33][34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that when face and car images are sufficiently distorted the model ceases to output waveforms comparable with those in the training data. It is not unreasonable to suspect that changes to the appearance of images might similarly influence ERP waveforms [32][33][34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that when face and car images are sufficiently distorted the model ceases to output waveforms comparable with those in the training data. It is not unreasonable to suspect that changes to the appearance of images might similarly influence ERP waveforms [31][32][33] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are alternative, albeit perhaps less exotic or conceptually appealing, explanations that have been proposed to account for differential responses to passive auditory oddball stimulation (Butler, 1968; May, 2021; May & Tiitinen, 2010; O'Reilly, 2021a, 2021b; O'Reilly & Conway, 2021; O'Reilly & O'Reilly, 2021). However, these are rarely considered preferable to the well‐supported predictive coding framework, even when dutifully considered (Lacroix et al, 2022). As they currently stand, neither predictive coding nor alternative sensory processing theories succinctly encapsulate all of the physiological phenomena observed in response to sequences of sounds, which shall therefore remain the purview of future efforts directed towards improving our understanding these processes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%