2013
DOI: 10.1504/ijapr.2013.052339
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The predictive power of ranking systems in association football

Abstract: We provide an overview and comparison of predictive capabilities of several methods for ranking association football teams. The main benchmark used is the official FIFA ranking for national teams. The ranking points of teams are turned into predictions that are next evaluated based on their accuracy. This enables us to determine which ranking method is more accurate. The best performing algorithm is a version of the famous Elo rating system that originates from chess player ratings, but several other methods (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
98
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
98
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings provide further rationale for the wide use of Elo-based predictions in the media and adds tennis to a growing list of sports for which Elo ratings have proven useful (Stefani 2011;Lasek, Szlávik, and Bhulai 2013). Still, the performance of the FiveThirtyEight might seem surprising given that the information it uses is fairly basic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…These findings provide further rationale for the wide use of Elo-based predictions in the media and adds tennis to a growing list of sports for which Elo ratings have proven useful (Stefani 2011;Lasek, Szlávik, and Bhulai 2013). Still, the performance of the FiveThirtyEight might seem surprising given that the information it uses is fairly basic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…See, for instance, the recent work of Kovalchik (2016) for tennis, Hvattum and Arntzen (2010) for English league football and Lasek, Szlávik and Bhulai (2013) for international football. 8 The latter article shows different methods having outcome MSEs in the range 12%-15%, though because of the frequency of draws in football these numbers are not directly comparable to our win-or-lose setting.…”
Section: Do Simulations Relate To Real Data?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of prediction errors for game outcomes is computed assuming that a draw can be regarded as half a win, half a loss [12]. We present the experimental results in Figure 7.…”
Section: Xbox Title Halo2mentioning
confidence: 99%