1929
DOI: 10.1021/ed006p93
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The prediction of the future performance of students from their past records

Abstract: This paper constitutes a report on a part of the work which we are doing in studying the value of the Aptitude or Placement Examination and of semester grades in predicting the future performance of our students.OurFreshman classes areconducted similarly to those in other institutions.In 1926-27, 879 students who had not had chemistry registered for General Chemistry. In the first week these students were given the Iowa Chemistry Aptitude Test, CT-1,A. From the results of this test the students were sectioned … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, math ability has received considerable attention in predictor studies (Kunhart et al, 1958;Schelar et al, 1963;Sieveking and Larson, 1969;Coley, 1973;Pickering, 1975;Andrews and Andrews, 1979;Ozsogomonyan and Loftus, 1979;Craney and Armstrong, 1985;Rixse and Pickering, 1985;Carmichael et al, 1986;Glover et al, 1991;Bunce and Hutchinson, 1993;Spencer, 1996;Wagner et al, 2002;Tai et al, 2005;Lewis, 2007, 2008; Leopold and Edgar, 2008). Other work has focused on relevant prior knowledge in chemistry, as measured by either ''placement tests'' (Scofield, 1927;Smith and Trimble, 1929;Hovey and Krohn, 1958;Schelar et al, 1963;Sieveking and Larson, 1969;Coley, 1973;Albanese et al, 1976;Hunter, 1976;Ozsogomonyan and Loftus, 1979;Niedzielski and Walmsey, 1982;Craney and Armstrong, 1985;Russell, 1994;McFate and Olmsted, 1999;Legg et al, 2001;Wagner et al, 2002;Pienta, 2003;Bentley and Gellene, 2005;Mills and Sweeney, 2009;Seery, 2009), or high school chemistry grades (Kunhart et al, 1958;Coley, 1973;Ozsogomonyan and L...…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, math ability has received considerable attention in predictor studies (Kunhart et al, 1958;Schelar et al, 1963;Sieveking and Larson, 1969;Coley, 1973;Pickering, 1975;Andrews and Andrews, 1979;Ozsogomonyan and Loftus, 1979;Craney and Armstrong, 1985;Rixse and Pickering, 1985;Carmichael et al, 1986;Glover et al, 1991;Bunce and Hutchinson, 1993;Spencer, 1996;Wagner et al, 2002;Tai et al, 2005;Lewis, 2007, 2008; Leopold and Edgar, 2008). Other work has focused on relevant prior knowledge in chemistry, as measured by either ''placement tests'' (Scofield, 1927;Smith and Trimble, 1929;Hovey and Krohn, 1958;Schelar et al, 1963;Sieveking and Larson, 1969;Coley, 1973;Albanese et al, 1976;Hunter, 1976;Ozsogomonyan and Loftus, 1979;Niedzielski and Walmsey, 1982;Craney and Armstrong, 1985;Russell, 1994;McFate and Olmsted, 1999;Legg et al, 2001;Wagner et al, 2002;Pienta, 2003;Bentley and Gellene, 2005;Mills and Sweeney, 2009;Seery, 2009), or high school chemistry grades (Kunhart et al, 1958;Coley, 1973;Ozsogomonyan and L...…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interest in predicting student performance in general chemistry dates back to the very early years of this Journal (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6), and the ability of the Toledo Exam (7 ), the California Chemistry Diagnostic Test (8), the SAT (9,10), and the ACT (11,12) to predict student performance in general chemistry courses is well documented. High school GPA and grades achieved in high school chemistry and mathematics classes have been used with some success (13).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Determining the preparedness of first-year college chemistry students has been on the minds of university educators for more than 75 years (1). Through the years, a large number of studies have examined correlations between the grade earned in a first-college level chemistry course and chemistry placement examination performance (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17), mathematics SAT or ACT scores (5,7,8,(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24), high school performance (6,7,(17)(18)(19)21), general intelligence and learning ability (6,9,17,(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30), and other criteria such as reading and English skills (19,23,31), or full-time versus part-time student status…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%