2020
DOI: 10.3390/f11121313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Prediction of Stiffness Reduction Non-Linear Phase in Bamboo Reinforced Concrete Beam Using the Finite Element Method (FEM) and Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs)

Abstract: This paper discusses the reduction of the stiffness of bamboo reinforced concrete (BRC) beams to support the use of bamboo as an environmentally friendly building material. Calculation of cross-section stiffness in numerical analysis is very important, especially in the non-linear phase. After the initial crack occurs, the stiffness of the cross-section will decrease with increasing load and crack propagation. The calculation of the stiffness in the cross-section of the concrete beam in the non-linear phase is… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The behavior of steel was simulated using an elastic-plastic modeling approach [52,53]. The properties of concrete, steel, and bamboo utilized in this study were obtained from previous research studies [8,23]. The material behavior of steel reinforcement is characterized by both elastic and plastic behaviors, with the elastic behavior described by Young's modulus and the plastic behavior defined by the post-yielding Young's modulus.…”
Section: Constitutive Modeling Of Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The behavior of steel was simulated using an elastic-plastic modeling approach [52,53]. The properties of concrete, steel, and bamboo utilized in this study were obtained from previous research studies [8,23]. The material behavior of steel reinforcement is characterized by both elastic and plastic behaviors, with the elastic behavior described by Young's modulus and the plastic behavior defined by the post-yielding Young's modulus.…”
Section: Constitutive Modeling Of Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bamboo, a forest product with significant social, economic, and ecological importance, has emerged as a promising natural and sustainable resource capable of substituting for traditional construction materials [8]. Its growing popularity signifies its potential as an alternative to replace steel reinforcement in reinforced concrete structures [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bambu kering, dibersihkan pada sisi dalam dan dipangkas dengan mesin gerinda (Muhtar, 2019) menjadi bentuk tulangan beton berukuran 15 x 15 mm². Lapisan kedap air No-drop atau Sikadur ® -752 ( (Ghavami, 2005); (Sabnani et al, 2012); (Puri et al, 2017); (Muhtar et al, 2018); (Muhtar, 2020d); (Muhtar, 2020a); (Muhtar, 2020e); (Muhtar et al, 2016); ; (Muhtar, 2020b); (Bhonde et al, 2014); (Muhtar, 2020c); ; Gunasti, 2017) diberikan pada batang bambu untuk menghindari aksi saling menyerap air dengan beton (Bhonde et al, 2014).…”
Section: Uraian Hasil Risetunclassified
“…Numerous studies recommended applying excessive reinforcement or a lower workload than the strength limit of the composite [38]. Despite the lower Table 1: Selected mechanical properties of bamboo and other reinforcing materials Reinforcing material Yield strength, MPa Tensile strength, MPa MOE, GPa Bamboo [7,19] 201 309 27 Steel [19][20][21] 442 620 207 GFRP [22][23][24] 680 3100-4150 57-86 CFPR [24,25] -3500-6000 230-600 AFRP [24,26] -1540-3400 70-140 BFRP [24,27] -3000-4840 [79][80][81][82][83][84][85][86][87][88][89][90][91][92][93] Notes: GFRP-Glass Fibre Reinforced Plastic; CFPR-Carbon Fibre Reinforced Plastic; AFRP-Aramid Fibre Reinforced Plastic; BFRP-Basalt Fibre Reinforced Plastic; MOE-Modulus of Elasticity.…”
Section: Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Muhtar [80] developed a calculation model for predicting local slip in BRC beams through the curvature moments and bond stress with 6% of uncertainty, proving the proposed model's high reliability. Muhtar [81] and Mishra et al [77] adopted FEM and ANN methods to predict stiffness reduction and deflection values for BRC beams, respectively. The validation of the proposed models constituted 85%-93% and 99% for each study, respectively.…”
Section: Mechanical Behavior Of Brc Beamsmentioning
confidence: 99%