1965
DOI: 10.1080/00224545.1965.9919655
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Prediction of Social Action from a Dimension of Internal-External Control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
62
1
1

Year Published

1970
1970
1993
1993

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
62
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Gore and Rotter (1963) found that southern Negro college students who scored highest on the mtemal dimension of the Rotter Internal-External (I-E) scale were significjantly higher m their response to an appeal to participate m a civil nghts demonstration than were those students sconng low on mtemal causahty Stnckland (1965) also found that Negro participants m the civil rights movement were significjantly higher on the mtemal causahty measure than a control group of Negro students.…”
Section: Eugene Thomas University Of Connecticutmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Gore and Rotter (1963) found that southern Negro college students who scored highest on the mtemal dimension of the Rotter Internal-External (I-E) scale were significjantly higher m their response to an appeal to participate m a civil nghts demonstration than were those students sconng low on mtemal causahty Stnckland (1965) also found that Negro participants m the civil rights movement were significjantly higher on the mtemal causahty measure than a control group of Negro students.…”
Section: Eugene Thomas University Of Connecticutmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Individuals with an intemal locus of control believe that the reinforcements they receive are contingent upon their own behavior, whereas individuals with an extemal locus of control beheve that the reinforcements they receive are a matter of chance or luck. In general, it has been observed, as predicted, that intemals are more active than extemals in their attempts to control or manipulate the environment in an effective way (Gore & Rotter, 1963;James, Woodruff, & Wemer, 1965;MacDonald, 1970;Seeman & Evans, 1962;Straits & Sechrest, 1963;Strickland, 1965).…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…But the individual's participation in such activity (his proneness to activism, whether violent or not) can be viewed rather differently. Some time ago, Gore & Rotter (1963) as well as Strickland (1965) proposed and found that low powerlessness (high mastery) correlated with greater social activism -in their case, greater expressed readiness to participate in civil rights activities -the thesis being that greater generalized confidence in the efficacy of one's action would translate into greater readiness to take part in such social action. As McWilliams (1973:66) puts it: ' ... estranged men are not often engaged in political protest; those who feel powerless are more inclined to submit and even to mask their resentments.…”
Section: Powerlessnessmentioning
confidence: 97%