2016 2nd IEEE International Conference on Computer and Communications (ICCC) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/compcomm.2016.7924808
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The prediction of attentional status with task difficulty based on EEG signals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Six studies attempted to identify real-time attention with machine learning algorithms, including a support vector machine (SVM) classifier (Liu et al, 2013;Rebolledo-Méndez et al, 2010;Zhong et al, 2016), a boosting and bagging of decision tree classifier (Qu et al, 2019), the K-means classifier (Qu et al, 2018), and a Logistic Regression Classifier and Multi-task Learning Classifier (Liu et al, 2017). Unlike the standard classification approaches mentioned above, Shaw et al (2022) utilized an unsupervised learning approach to obtaining handcrafted EEG for capturing attention.…”
Section: Algorithm and Software Development For Attention Monitoring ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Six studies attempted to identify real-time attention with machine learning algorithms, including a support vector machine (SVM) classifier (Liu et al, 2013;Rebolledo-Méndez et al, 2010;Zhong et al, 2016), a boosting and bagging of decision tree classifier (Qu et al, 2019), the K-means classifier (Qu et al, 2018), and a Logistic Regression Classifier and Multi-task Learning Classifier (Liu et al, 2017). Unlike the standard classification approaches mentioned above, Shaw et al (2022) utilized an unsupervised learning approach to obtaining handcrafted EEG for capturing attention.…”
Section: Algorithm and Software Development For Attention Monitoring ...mentioning
confidence: 99%