2005
DOI: 10.1080/02705060.2005.9664800
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Predation Impact of LarvalPseudorasbora parva(Cyprinidae) on Zooplankton: a Mesocosm Experiment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
9
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Marked feeding pressure of P. parva on zooplankton under the carp-pond conditions was described by , Adámek & Sukop (2000) and Oberle (2003) and under the experimental conditions by Hanazato & Yasuno (1989), Chang et al (2004) and Nagata et al (2005). However, the results from fishponds in this study documented even more drastic impact on whole zooplankton communities.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Marked feeding pressure of P. parva on zooplankton under the carp-pond conditions was described by , Adámek & Sukop (2000) and Oberle (2003) and under the experimental conditions by Hanazato & Yasuno (1989), Chang et al (2004) and Nagata et al (2005). However, the results from fishponds in this study documented even more drastic impact on whole zooplankton communities.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Horák fishpond was used as a control locality without additional feeding of carp and thus large Cladocera were depressed soon after their spring abundance maximum in 2004. Chironomid larvae are a common component of the food of P. parva (Muchačeva 1950;Guirca 1970;Adámek & Siddiqui 1997;Xie et al 2000;Hliwa et al 2002;Nagata et al 2005). Although Baruš et al (1995) and especially Wolfram-Wais et al (1999) and Declerck et al (2002) reported that chironomids were significantly preferred by P. parva, the influence of P. parva presence on density of chironomid larvae has not been clearly proved in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4). This result differs from that of many other studies in which larval fish significantly suppressed the abundance of cladoceran zooplankton (Dettmers and Stein 1992;Nagata et al 2005). The difference might not be due to larval size (namely gape size), because the gape size of the larval pond smelt was almost 0.6 mm at the end of the experiment.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 85%
“…Predator^prey studies usually focus on changes in prey abundance due to predation (Mills, Green & Schiavone Jr 1987;Persson & Greenberg 1990;Wu & Culver 1994;Spencer, Potter, Bukantis & Stanford 1999;Gliwicz et al 2004;Nagata, Ha & Hanazato 2005;Makrakis et al 2008; but see Slusarczyk 1997). In this study, we sought to evaluate primarily the importance of a size-selective predator's density on its prey's life-history sizes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%