2022
DOI: 10.1080/09614524.2022.2057441
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The precarity of gender, migration, and locations: case studies from Bangladesh and Nepal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There was a rapid increase in women's short‐term migration from Bangladesh in the decade to 2019: ‘There were 10,000 women migrants in 2010 under the various domestic work categories, which rose almost tenfold to 96,881 in 2019’ (Wu & Kilby, 2022, p. 7), albeit from a low base and without any specific government support. Women in 2018 were still only 12 per cent of the total migrant cohort (Shamim & Holliday, 2018).…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was a rapid increase in women's short‐term migration from Bangladesh in the decade to 2019: ‘There were 10,000 women migrants in 2010 under the various domestic work categories, which rose almost tenfold to 96,881 in 2019’ (Wu & Kilby, 2022, p. 7), albeit from a low base and without any specific government support. Women in 2018 were still only 12 per cent of the total migrant cohort (Shamim & Holliday, 2018).…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, both long-term and short-term effects of migration and remittance have been observed from the perspectives of human development and gender development [12][13][14]. It has been seen from the perspective of different countries and contexts that migration and remittance have mostly positive and significant effects in terms of improving human development index (HDI) score [15][16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3.‘Under the kafala system, rather than the migrant taking responsibility for themselves through local regulatory frameworks and employment processes, the migrant’s sponsor assumes this responsibility for the period of the migration and pays a sponsorship fee to the government as a form of “surety”, to ensure the migrant does not break any laws or breach regulations. This results in the sponsor restricting the migrants’ freedom in a number of ways ranging from withholding their wages or passports to actually detaining them in the house, with limited access to the outside world’ (Wu & Kilby, 2023). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%