A neural turn? On the ontology of the geographical subject Korf, B Korf, B (2008 A neural turn? On the ontology of the geographical subject
AbstractThe modernist conception of the autonomous "subject" as centred, sovereign, and coherently rational, acting intentionally, knowledgeably, and volitionally, has been challenged from a variety of sources, including poststructuralism, feminism, and posthumanism. A different kind of attack on the modernist subject has recently been staged by neurobiologists who have started to decentre the subject from within -to "naturalise" (and materialise) the subject. This biological naturalism -the new "life sciences" -claims to challenge our conceptions of self, the ethical subject, and what we conceive of as "life". But what conceptions we have of the configurations of the self is fundamental to our understandings and conceptions of ethics. This paper traces a debate between German neurobiologists and (post)humanist philosophers on the ontology of such things as "free will", "ethical agency", and the "self" as an example of how the dispute between naturalists and nonnaturalist or postnaturalists is instrumental in sharpening our understanding of the self and of ethical agency. The paper argues that naturalism is bound to fail due to its inability to grasp the intersubjectivist nature of ethical agency, a theme which links up with recent geographical writing on ethics. I suggest, building on a recent contribution of Huib Ernste in this journal, that we should consider Helmuth Plessner's concept of eccentric positionality and ontology of the possible as a postmetaphysical kind of ethical humanism.
A neural turn?On the ontology of the geographical subject
A neural turn?On the ontology of the geographical subject
Abstract:The modernist conception of the autonomous "subject" as centred, sovereign and coherently rational acting intentionally, knowledgeably and volitionally has been challenged from a variety of sources, including poststructuralism, feminism and posthumanism. A different kind of attack on the modernist subject has recently been staged by neurobiologists who have started to decentre the subject from within -to "naturalise" (and materialise) the subject. This The modernist conception of the autonomous "subject" which is centred, sovereign and coherently rational and acts intentionally, knowledgeably and volitionally has been challenged from a variety of sources. A widely accepted view in poststructuralist writings holds that the subject has become subjected to the workings of power, language and desire and is not the main or most relevant origin of action (Ernste 2004, 440). Some feminist authors, eg Diprose (2002), argue that the identity of any self is performed and reconstituted within acts, which undermines the modernist idea of the subject remaining unchanged by her act and thus being held accountable for those acts. Posthumanism disaggregates, distributes and dislodges the human subject -the subject becomes local, fluid and contingent: "Human rationality loses its...