2014
DOI: 10.1515/ip-2014-0001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The pragmatics of insinuation

Abstract: In this paper, I focus on insinuation as a communicative strategy whereby\ud a speaker intends to make an addressee believe p, but does not want to be held\ud accountable for communicating p. In its micro- or macro-textual format, and in\ud its various degrees of nastiness, insinuation, I claim, is a complex process that\ud presupposes the mind’s capability to simultaneously activate and run multiple\ud parallel mental spaces, associated to different intentions. Through the analysis of\ud some examples, indire… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Insinuation emerges as an indicator of off-record impoliteness, characterized by the expression of unpleasant hints or suggestions regarding DepEd's implementation of learning delivery modalities. An insinuation is employed by speakers to make addressees believe them without being held accountable for their statements (Papi, 2014). Online comments demonstrate critics expressing weariness and annoyance towards DepEd's ineffective programs while evading accountability for their expressions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Insinuation emerges as an indicator of off-record impoliteness, characterized by the expression of unpleasant hints or suggestions regarding DepEd's implementation of learning delivery modalities. An insinuation is employed by speakers to make addressees believe them without being held accountable for their statements (Papi, 2014). Online comments demonstrate critics expressing weariness and annoyance towards DepEd's ineffective programs while evading accountability for their expressions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Mahon (2008), "to deceive=to intentionally cause another person to have (or continue to have) a false belief that is truly believed to be false by the person intentionally causing a false belief." (cited in Papi, 2014, p9) Buller&Burgoon (2004 propose certain factors through which the process of deception is determined. Among these factors come: "contextual factors, senders' and receivers' pre-interaction, pre-existing knowledge, the positive or negative valence of the relationship between conversational partners, and initial expectations for honesty within the exchange."…”
Section: -Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…cirlo directamente-y, al mismo tiempo, reflexionan y dicen algo sobre lo que están haciendo.Las insinuaciones suelen ser analizadas como delicadas estrategias comunicativas en las que el insinuador manipula la relación entre lo dicho y lo no dicho para cubrir su intención frente a un interlocutor(Bertuccelli Papi 2014; ver también Reyes 2004). Entendidas de esta manera, las insinuaciones parten de la distinción entre individuos discretos con intenciones claramente definidas que pueden ser mostradas u ocultadas.Pero, aunque los esmeralderos suelen reconocer que las esmeraldas son voluntariosas, que deciden a quién aparecérsele, que eligen, que llaman, con sus insinuaciones no buscan manipularlas ni convencerlas subrepticiamente de algo ni, mucho menos, ocultar su responsabilidad (para una discusión sobre la distribución de la responsabilidad en este contexto ver Caraballo Acuña[2019]); los guaqueros no se relacionan con ellas como entidades cuyas intenciones puedan ser discretamente definidas y manipuladas.…”
unclassified