The practice of choice-making: applying Bourdieu to the field of international schooling

Abstract

This paper presents findings from a recent study on choice-making among teachers, school leaders and parents in a for-profit British international school in Kuwait. Using a Bourdieusian field analysis, the choice-making of the various stakeholders is investigated to reveal their positionality within the school’s social space, to examine the resources they hold and the capitals in which they are willing to invest. We find that choices made by, and within, an international school reveal symbolic violence, and a ‘taken-for-granted understanding’ that this form of schooling (British- rather than American-style international schooling) is superior. Participants in the study included teachers, parents, graduating class students and school leaders. Teachers and parents were a representative mix of local (both Arab and non-Arab) and expatriate. The study makes an important contribution to the body of knowledge relating to international schools, in its theoretical framework and its inclusion of the wider stakeholder population, which together generate a deeper understanding of professional practice in the international school context.

The Implications of the “Double Reduction” Policy on School Choice in China Based on Capital Theory

“…One's position in a particular field depends on how one obtains, utilizes, and explores capital treasured by the field. Individuals in a field internalize the rules manifested by an individual's habitus and create recognized practices based on the norms [9] . It bridges the internal and external worlds and links one's past and present.…”

Students' Academic Habitus and Its Relation to Family Capital: A Latent Class Approach to Inequalities among Secondary School Students1

“…In addition, there still is a methodological divide in how scholars use Bourdieu's theory. Most education research on habitus uses qualitative methods, and over the past decade, there has been an increased worldwide interest in habitus in studies on higher education (e.g., for Sweden: Ivemark and Ambrose 2021; Canada: Lehmann 2014; for Italy: Romito 2022; China: Xie and Reay 2020) as well as in research on schooling and elite reproduction in the Global South (e.g., Ayling 2019; Khalil and Kelly 2020). Qualitative researchers frequently refer to habitus to explore and describe matching and mismatching processes that students face in educational institutions (Barrett and Martina 2012).…”

Preferred Reporting Items for A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (Prisma): The Impact of Covid-19 on University Reputation and Comparative Evaluation

“…These and many more account for the reasons foreign students don't consider NPUs as choices. The perception of university reputation is a fundamental asset to stakeholders' choices, believability, and acceptability (Adefulu et al, 2020;El Nemar et al, 2020;Khalil & Kelly, 2020). Therefore, effective management of UR has become a critical issue for universities, requiring attention (Indradevi, 2020).…”