2012
DOI: 10.1080/87568225.2012.711142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Practice of Campus-Based Threat Assessment: An Overview

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These assertions may be accurate, as campus threat assessment was developed due to consistent findings within government agency, media, and police records of public figure, primary/secondary school, and workplace threats and attacks (Deisinger et al, 2008;Deisinger et al, 2014;Drysdale et al, 2010;Randazzo & Cameron, 2012) and has widespread support and use (Bolante, 2014;Pollard et al, 2012;Randazzo & Cameron, 2012). Additionally, campus threat assessment has been deemed an "emerging standard of care" (Deisinger et al, 2014, p.107;Randazzo & Cameron, 2012, p.285) for inhibiting "targeted on-campus violence" (Pollard et al, 2012, p.264).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These assertions may be accurate, as campus threat assessment was developed due to consistent findings within government agency, media, and police records of public figure, primary/secondary school, and workplace threats and attacks (Deisinger et al, 2008;Deisinger et al, 2014;Drysdale et al, 2010;Randazzo & Cameron, 2012) and has widespread support and use (Bolante, 2014;Pollard et al, 2012;Randazzo & Cameron, 2012). Additionally, campus threat assessment has been deemed an "emerging standard of care" (Deisinger et al, 2014, p.107;Randazzo & Cameron, 2012, p.285) for inhibiting "targeted on-campus violence" (Pollard et al, 2012, p.264).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Threat assessment has been considered the best campus targeted violence prevention option (Cornell, 2010;Deisinger et al, 2008;Deisinger et al, 2014;Randazzo & Cameron, 2012;Pollard, Nolan, & Deisinger, 2012;Scalora et al, 2010). Across contexts (e.g., primary/ secondary schools, public figure protection agencies, workplaces), proper threat assessment has been noted to have significant success resolving dangerous situations (Booth et al, 2011;Calhoun & Weston, 2003;Cornell, Sheras, Gregory, & Fan, 2009;Jenkins, 2009;Scalora, Zimmerman, & Wells, 2008).…”
Section: The Development Of Campus Threat Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Finally, given the large proportion of mass shootings where prior communications and behavior signal danger, an obvious topic to explore further is how to optimize the use of GVROs. When shootings occur, it has become routine to determine how often signals were detected but not reported and how often signals were reported but not acted on (Bolante & Dykeman, ; Pollard, Nolan, & Deisinger, ; Weisenbach Keller, Hughes, & Hertz, ). Again, specificity will be a concern.…”
Section: Gun Violence Restraining Ordersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there is anecdotal evidence to suggest that GVROs and similar policies may thwart mass violence, this case‐by‐case approach is necessarily limited: its efficacy is reliant on third‐party reports of warning signs, which are not always made, passed to the appropriate authorities, or acted on (Bolante & Dykeman, ; Pollard et al., ; Weisenbach Keller et al., ). More fundamentally, even an effective case‐by‐case approach cannot be scaled up to the population level.…”
Section: Machine Learning Analysis Of Firearm Purchasing Recordsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Randazzo and Plummer (2009) described a comprehensive threat assessment team as one that maintains and represents interests of faculty and staff and chaired by a chief of police. Similarly, Pollard, et al (2010) discussed resources and activities that support team functioning: a systematic process used to understand concern (information gathering and initial threat analysis), efficient developmental support for adequate case management, and protocols for services. Team goals outlined by Randazzo and Plummer (2009) Communication during crisis.…”
Section: Figure 5 2010 Team Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%