2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10746-006-9029-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Practical Work of <Coding>: An Ethnomethodological Inquiry

Abstract: While previous methodological studies have suggested that coding is a useful technique for analyzing qualitative data, there is a stark lack of discussion about the incongruities that inevitably arise as researchers accomplish the actual work of coding. This article explores the complexities of the coding process, and how incongruities get resolved as researchers accomplish the practical work of coding. Three primary themes emerged from this study: , Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis plan, which used a content analysis approach, included an initial review of all translated transcripts by two members of the study team who also developed a codebook. Two coders trained in qualitative methods independently read and analyzed transcripts to identify salient convergent themes [ 21 ]. All transcripts were then coded based on broad categories of the areas of inquiry of the focus group guide.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis plan, which used a content analysis approach, included an initial review of all translated transcripts by two members of the study team who also developed a codebook. Two coders trained in qualitative methods independently read and analyzed transcripts to identify salient convergent themes [ 21 ]. All transcripts were then coded based on broad categories of the areas of inquiry of the focus group guide.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A method used throughout was to consider very closely the semantic structure of the specific diary entry, using a “close reading” approach similar to that used in (Stabenov 2003) and (Main 1993) (see Table 1 for specific examples), in order to evaluate whether a given statement was “reactive” or “reperceiving.” Conflict between coders was resolved through discussion as in (Olszewski, Macey et al 2006). A final note regarding qualitative analysis: as many have suggested, qualitative research in general and grounded theory in particular may be inescapably based on the interpretive methods of the coders and the broader interpretive frame of the investigation as a whole (Charmaz 2006).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This process of double coding followed by resolution of disagreements was used to improve reliability (Baxter and Jack ; Olszewski et al. ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%