2020
DOI: 10.21203/rs.2.19589/v2
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The “PPI Hawker”: An innovative method for Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) in health research

Abstract: Background: Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) in health research entails doing research ‘with’ the public. Successful PPI requires a diversity of patients’ perspectives and experiences. In Singapore, including the public’s voice in research is still in its infancy and different ways of involving the public have to be explored. Our aims were to describe a PPI initiative that enables members of the public to share their ideas and opinions about health research, and to assess the feasibility, accessibility and… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The PPI Hawker Team conducted two PPI Hawkers successfully engaging the Malay and Indian populations. (628) At the end of the month the CAG got university ethical approval, and I informed the Liaison. We started planning for the CAG, including drafting an agenda for the conversation around return of results and format of the report, and an activity to determine whether participants could understand the distinction between research and clinical purposes.…”
Section: Stage 4 14 Monthsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The PPI Hawker Team conducted two PPI Hawkers successfully engaging the Malay and Indian populations. (628) At the end of the month the CAG got university ethical approval, and I informed the Liaison. We started planning for the CAG, including drafting an agenda for the conversation around return of results and format of the report, and an activity to determine whether participants could understand the distinction between research and clinical purposes.…”
Section: Stage 4 14 Monthsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two research abstracts (one presenting the findings from qualitative interviews, one discussing the PPI Hawker and its adaptation to other cultural contexts) were accepted for an oral presentation at the 2020 WONCA Asia-Pacific, showing the increasing interest around public involvement in research in this region. Unfortunately, this conference has been postponed due to the Covid-19 pandemic.Finally, regarding my publications,(516,628,647,648) the early impact can be seen on Twitter. My tweet disseminating my first paper(516) (which focused on researchers' perspectives on public involvement) had a very positive response, with over 3,000 impressions and 107 engagements (many more than usual).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%