The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2014
DOI: 10.1080/00094056.2014.933665
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Power of Why: Connecting Curriculum to Students' Lives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
7
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The more that task components connect to students' lives outside of school, the more likely they are to be seen as authentic. call teacher educators can help their pre-service teachers see activities as authentic by answering the question "why" they are doing them (Egbert & Roe, 2014). This also then provides a model for these future teachers to follow when they are in their own classrooms working to engage their language learners.…”
Section: Theoretical Foundationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The more that task components connect to students' lives outside of school, the more likely they are to be seen as authentic. call teacher educators can help their pre-service teachers see activities as authentic by answering the question "why" they are doing them (Egbert & Roe, 2014). This also then provides a model for these future teachers to follow when they are in their own classrooms working to engage their language learners.…”
Section: Theoretical Foundationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hayes et al, 2006) suggest that it is good teachers who can make the greatest differences to student outcomes in schools. In order to achieve social justice and generate excellent outcomes for students, teachers need to share ideas and knowledge with each other, with students and communities (Egbert & Roe, 2014;Hayes et al, 2006;McRae, 1988). Teachers also need to identify and document knowledge that exists in students' homes and communities to strengthen the relationship with schools and between parents and teachers, which will enable students to be more engaged in their learning (Egbert & Roe, 2014;Gonzalez, 2005).…”
Section: Teaching For a 'Good Life'mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to achieve social justice and generate excellent outcomes for students, teachers need to share ideas and knowledge with each other, with students and communities (Egbert & Roe, 2014;Hayes et al, 2006;McRae, 1988). Teachers also need to identify and document knowledge that exists in students' homes and communities to strengthen the relationship with schools and between parents and teachers, which will enable students to be more engaged in their learning (Egbert & Roe, 2014;Gonzalez, 2005). Making connections between homes and classrooms determines the extent to which knowledge is more meaningful to students and develops students' knowledge and skills in the context of solving real-life issues or problems (Hayes et al, 2006;McLaren, 1998).…”
Section: Teaching For a 'Good Life'mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Otras corrientes constructivistas se suceden en el tiempo y a partir de los años 80, la transferencia se plantea en el terreno científico, como un sistema de interacción entre las personas y su entorno (Nokes-Malach & Mestre, 2013) que posibilitan procesos de aprendizaje relacionados con la autorregulación metacognitiva (Egbert & Roe, 2014;Georghiades, 2000;Hovelynck, 2000;Leberman & Martin, 2004). Se empieza a estudiar los beneficios de la transferencia producidos por el trabajo en grupo (Georghiades, 2000), la importancia de analizar o identificar perspectivas en las tareas cotidianas (Egbert & Roe, 2014) o la importancia de los tiempos de reflexión (Leberman & Martin, 2004). Destacan también las destrezas de pensamiento de (Adey & Shayer, 1993;Kok-Auntoh & Woolnough, 1994) emplean patrones de interacción cotidianos para relacionarlo con el proceso de aprendizaje, la contextualización de los contenidos y su aplicación (Engle, 2012).…”
Section: Conceptualización De La Transferencia En El Aprendizaje Escolarunclassified
“…Es frecuente confundir transferencia con aprendizaje, autores como Smedslund (1953) La literatura explica la transferencia a partir de una serie de variables (Figura 3) que tienen que ver con aspectos de tipo cognitivo y metacognitivo entre los que se incluyen la resolución y construcción de analogías (Harpaz-Itay et al, 2006), la generalización y la codificación (Gentner, Loewenstein, & Thompson, 2003;Georghiades, 2000), la comprensión conceptual (Bernardo, 2001;Egbert & Roe, 2014;Georghiades, 2000;Sanjosé López et al, 2007) y la reflexión y metacognición (Ayers & Ayers, 2014;Harpaz-Itay et al, 2006); aspectos emocionales y motivacionales que implican la motivación (Peters et al, 2012) y la participación activa del alumnado en las tareas (Chapman, 2003;Lin, Hong, & Huang, 2012) mediante oportunidades de colaboración y de interacción (Egbert, 2009); por último, los aspectos contextuales en los que se incluyen las características temporales y espaciales del entorno de enseñanza-aprendizaje (Bernardo, 2001…”
Section: Dimensiones Y Variables Que Definen La Transferencia Educativaunclassified