The power of the unseen: environmental conflict, the media and invisibility

Abstract

This article critically revisits the operation of 'mediated visibility' in the context of environmental conflict. Challenger groups have long gained access to news media and influenced political decision-makers by staging highly visible protest events that draw public attention to environmental threats and destruction. The advent of the world-wide web and digital media tools has since added to the tactical arsenal available to groups wanting to infiltrate and disrupt government and corporate networks of power. In turn, governments and corporations deploy these same tools to maintain their reputation and check opponents who oppose their activities. These developments have, we argue, produced a significant flow-on effect. The function of invisibility -or the coordinated avoidance of media communication, attention and respresentation in order to achieve political and/or social endsis an under-examined feature of contemporary environmental politics. The case study and evidence presented here are drawn from fieldwork conducted in the Australian island state of Tasmania, and extensive content analysis of news media, social networking platforms and websites.

Canadian News Media Coverage of Climate Change: Historical Trajectories, Dominant Frames, and International Comparisons

“…Our analysis focuses on the Globe and Mail and the National Post because they are the only nationally circulated print newspapers (though both are English only), and may be considered ''legacy media'' with a national scope (Lester and Hutchins 2012). Both have wide distribution in Canada, with average weekly circulations of 2,139,363 (Globe and Mail) and 982,555 (National Post) for combined digital and print editions (Canadian Newspaper Association 2013).…”

Incomplete Knowledge, Rumour and Truth Seeking

“…There can be a lot of news value in an emerging scandal or conspiracy. Often beginning with rumour, it can create the tantalising tension between those seeking visibility and those seeking to control revelation (Entman 2012;Lester and Hutchins 2012) and in these types of contests, leaking information can be part of the "explicit strategy" of individuals who understand the power of mediatised visibility (Thompson 2005, 31).…”

Transforming forest landscape conflicts: the promises and perils of global forest management initiatives such as REDD+

“…The negative environmental and social impacts of these types of conflicts are increasingly reported in the news media and analyzed in the academic literature (e.g. Gritten et al, 2012;Lester and Hutchins, 2012;Munden Project, 2012;Dhiaulhaq et al, 2014) along with the causes of these conflicts. One direct cause that is consistently highlighted involves an outside actor accessing a forest landscape with a project -whether it be establishment of protected areas by the government (e.g.…”