2009
DOI: 10.4135/9781483350356
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Power of Talk: How Words Change our Lives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, although it was a misbehaviour, the students compensated for the misbehaviour explaining why she was talking to her friend. Moreover, positive teachers treat students equally; teachers have the authority to decide on who should participate and when and where they could do so (Briscoe et al, 2009). One teacher was accused by students to favour one student over others.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, although it was a misbehaviour, the students compensated for the misbehaviour explaining why she was talking to her friend. Moreover, positive teachers treat students equally; teachers have the authority to decide on who should participate and when and where they could do so (Briscoe et al, 2009). One teacher was accused by students to favour one student over others.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Raquel recognized, "It is easier for some people to see you as the exception because they don't have to change their little minds about a whole group of people." Downloaded by [University of Chicago Library] at 22:13 18 October 2014 Second, such a tactic of exceptionalism affirms the illusion of meritocracy (Briscoe, Arriaza, & Henze, 2009). If a society is a meritocracy, then people in that society succeed or fail according to their merits, not according to their ethnicity or gender.…”
Section: Configuration Of the Tactics Of Powermentioning
confidence: 95%
“…With a focus on power, critical discourse analysis disrupts the tacit forces that operate through seemingly neutral words (Briscoe et al . ).…”
Section: Critical Discourse Analysismentioning
confidence: 97%