2006
DOI: 10.1090/s0025-5718-06-01944-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The power of standard information for multivariate approximation in the randomized setting

Abstract: Abstract. We study approximating multivariate functions from a reproducing kernel Hilbert space with the error between the function and its approximation measured in a weighted L 2 -norm. We consider functions with an arbitrarily large number of variables, d, and we focus on the randomized setting with algorithms using standard information consisting of function values at randomly chosen points.We prove that standard information in the randomized setting is as powerful as linear information in the worst case s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
58
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(51 reference statements)
1
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is unknown if similar relations hold for = std . We need to discuss a recent result from [17] that provides the relation between the nth minimal errors e wor (n; L 2,ρ , all ) and e ran (n; L 2,ρ , std ). This result states that, modulo a power of the double logarithm of n, the minimal errors behave in a similar way.…”
Section: Known Results For Weighted L 2 Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…It is unknown if similar relations hold for = std . We need to discuss a recent result from [17] that provides the relation between the nth minimal errors e wor (n; L 2,ρ , all ) and e ran (n; L 2,ρ , std ). This result states that, modulo a power of the double logarithm of n, the minimal errors behave in a similar way.…”
Section: Known Results For Weighted L 2 Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the randomized setting, we allow the sampling points x j and/or the functions a j in (1.1) to be randomly selected. The following result has been established in [17]:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations