2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.03.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The power of (Mis)perception: Rethinking suicide contagion in youth friendship networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
15
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Another source of error concerns accuracy and interpretation of ESB events. Zimmerman and colleagues (2016) found evidence of projection bias, as youth who had attempted suicide tended to overestimate peer suicidal behaviors. This study found younger participants and women were more likely to report a friend’s suicide attempt.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another source of error concerns accuracy and interpretation of ESB events. Zimmerman and colleagues (2016) found evidence of projection bias, as youth who had attempted suicide tended to overestimate peer suicidal behaviors. This study found younger participants and women were more likely to report a friend’s suicide attempt.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Other studies, examining a variety of ages and cultures, have also found ESB associations were influenced by a variety of factors, such as age, type of exposure (family vs acquaintance), psychiatric history and number of NLEs (e.g. Burke et al, 2010; Elias et al, 2012; Tong, Phillips, Duberstein, & Zhan, 2015; Zimmerman, Rees, Posick, & Zimmerman, 2016). Evidence against a hypothesis can be more important than supporting data as it can prove the hypothesized trends are not consistent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Despite the potential of internet-based social networking interventions for supporting youth at risk of suicide, there is concern about possible risks such as normalising suicidal behaviours and reinforcing them [15,23]. Additionally, just as clustering and contagion of suicidal behaviour have been demonstrated to occur in offline social networks [24,25], there may be a risk of such phenomena occurring in online settings, perhaps to an even greater degree [26,27]. Therefore, although online interventions incorporating theory-driven therapeutic content and peer-to-peer support may have great potential to target risk factors related to suicide in a format that is engaging and accessible to youth, they must incorporate considered safety procedures, including moderation and regular monitoring of user-generated content.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One recent literature review (Maple et al ., 2016) concluded that suicidal risk increased among adolescents beyond exposure from family numbers (i.e. friends, schoolmates or acquaintances) possibly due to imitation (Zimmerman et al ., 2016). However, previous studies of suicide exposure did not distinguish between the effects of exposure to a family member's suicidal behaviours and exposure to friends’/close acquaintance’ suicidal behaviours (Wong et al ., 2005; McMahon et al ., 2013), and did not examine the effects of ESB in both relatives and friends/close acquaintances (Nanayakkara et al ., 2013; Abrutyn and Mueller, 2014; Song et al ., 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%