2021
DOI: 10.1177/15480518211012408
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Power of Followers That do not Follow: Investigating the Effects of Follower Resistance, Leader Implicit Followership Theories and Leader Negative Affect on the Emergence of Destructive Leader Behavior

Abstract: This study focuses on follower resistance as a potential antecedent of destructive leader behavior and examines leader-related moderators and mediators to help explain the relationship between follower resistance and destructive leader behavior. Drawing from implicit followership theories, we propose that the relationship between follower resistance and destructive leader behavior is moderated by leaders’ Theory X schema. Furthermore, we build on affective events theory to hypothesize that follower resistance … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 114 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This interpretation is supported by the results of the present study, finding slightly moderate toxic leadership and high nurse effectiveness. Meanwhile, Güntner et al (2021), and Kusy and Kurtulmuş (2020) report that toxic leaders may have a detrimental effect on followers. The results of this study were consistent with the studies of Hannah et al (2013), Kellerman (2004), Kusy and Holloway (2009), Krasikova et al, (2013), Pelletier (2010), Shaw et al, (2011), andTepper et al, (2009), who revealed that toxic leadership has a negative correlation with follower effectiveness in terms of active disengagement, poor critical thinking and poor performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This interpretation is supported by the results of the present study, finding slightly moderate toxic leadership and high nurse effectiveness. Meanwhile, Güntner et al (2021), and Kusy and Kurtulmuş (2020) report that toxic leaders may have a detrimental effect on followers. The results of this study were consistent with the studies of Hannah et al (2013), Kellerman (2004), Kusy and Holloway (2009), Krasikova et al, (2013), Pelletier (2010), Shaw et al, (2011), andTepper et al, (2009), who revealed that toxic leadership has a negative correlation with follower effectiveness in terms of active disengagement, poor critical thinking and poor performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The organizational follower and the concepts behind followership have gained significant momentum in leadership studies (e.g., Bastrdoz & Van Vugt, 2019; M. K. Carsten et al., 2010; Coyle & Foti, 2022; Günter et al., 2021; Hoption et al., 2012; Kelley, 2008). Uhl‐Bien et al.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the threat to supervisors’ leadership identity can be activated by their perception of the difference between an ideal leadership identity and the leadership identity actually granted by employees ( Higgins, 1987 ). For example, supervisors may perceive a leader identity threat when subordinates challenge their authority ( Tedeschi and Felson, 1994 ; Tepper et al, 2017 ; Güntner et al, 2021 ). In the next section, we elaborate in detail on how and when employee voice, a challenging behavior, is positively related to leader identity threat.…”
Section: Theoretical Development and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%