The Power of Exercise and the Exercise of Power: The Harvard Fatigue Laboratory, Distance Running, and the Disappearance of Work, 1919–1947

Abstract

In the early twentieth century, fatigue research marked an area of conflicting scientific, industrial, and cultural understandings of working bodies. These different understandings of the working body marked a key site of political conflict during the growth of industrial capitalism. Many fatigue researchers understood fatigue to be a physiological fact and allied themselves with Progressive-era reformers in urging industrial regulation. Opposed to these researchers were advocates of Taylorism and scientific management, who held that fatigue was a mental event and that productivity could be perpetually increased through managerial efficiency. Histories of this conflict typically cease with the end of the First World War, when it is assumed that industrial fatigue research withered away. This article extends the history of fatigue research through examining the activities of the Harvard Fatigue Laboratory in the 1920s and 1930s. The Laboratory developed sophisticated biochemical techniques to study the blood of exercising individuals. In particular, it found that exercising individuals could attain a biochemically "steady state," or equilibrium, and extrapolated from this to assert that fatigue was psychological, not physiological, in nature. In contrast to Progressive-era research, the Laboratory reached this conclusion through laboratory examination, not of industrial workers, but of Laboratory staff members and champion marathon runners. The translation of laboratory research to industrial settings, and the eventual erasure of physiological fatigue from discussions of labor, was a complex function of institutional settings, scientific innovation, and the cultural meanings of work and sport.

Tracking selves or tracking relationships? Means of measuring time amongst Ethiopian runners

“…For many of the scientists concerned with the ‘human motor’, the goal was to diminish the fatigue of the worker without damaging output , to contest a drive led by Frederick Winslow Taylor for efficiencies that increased speed and efficiency at any cost. Runners were caught up in this ‘politics of fatigue’ (Scheffler 2015) in experiments at the Harvard Fatigue Laboratory in the early twentieth century. Through using seven‐time Boston marathon champion Clarence de Mar as their research subject, scientists were able to argue paradoxically against the idea of physiological fatigue in the workplace through the ‘fashioning of an athletic body in stable chemical equilibrium that could be substituted for a worker's body with a finite reserve of energy in fatigue studies’ (Scheffler 2015: 393).…”

“…Runners were caught up in this ‘politics of fatigue’ (Scheffler 2015) in experiments at the Harvard Fatigue Laboratory in the early twentieth century. Through using seven‐time Boston marathon champion Clarence de Mar as their research subject, scientists were able to argue paradoxically against the idea of physiological fatigue in the workplace through the ‘fashioning of an athletic body in stable chemical equilibrium that could be substituted for a worker's body with a finite reserve of energy in fatigue studies’ (Scheffler 2015: 393). The marketing slogan for Eliud Kipchoge's eventually successful two‐hour marathon was ‘#NoHumanIsLimited’, which essentially sums up the position of those industrialists who sought to deny the existence of fatigue and physiological limits a century earlier.…”

Higher and colder: The success and failure of boundaries in high altitude and Antarctic research stations

“…While the role of military money and pressures in 20th century science is hardly a new discovery, the role of sport is almost entirely invisible (with some exceptions, mostly relating to drugs and altitude; for example, Heggie, 2008;Tracy, 2012;Wrynn, 2004Wrynn, , 2006, and while explorers are crucial actors in earlier scientific networks, they barely feature in existing histories of 20th-century work (Heggie, 2014). It may be that the heavy involvement of sport and exploration are unique features of field sites, but we are not yet in a position to make that assertion, and it seems unlikely since the few works on recent experimental physiology, such as those by Andi Johnson (2013) or Robin Scheffler (2011Scheffler ( , 2015, suggest that sport's relation to all the homes of science is an area ripe for reconsideration.…”

Bodies, Sport and Science in the Nineteenth Century

“…The fatigue of working men, and the implied need, if any, for the reform of working hours, was one such puzzle they tackled, and one that researchers sometimes examined by using the performance of elite sportsmen rather than that of ordinary factory-workers. 84…”