The Power of Bearing Wit(h)ness

Tufo, Alisa Del; Fine, Michelle; Cahill, Liam; Okafor, Chinyere Grace; Cook, Donelda

doi:10.1093/oso/9780190864750.003.0006

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…There is much to learn about transformative praxis from community, grassroots and social movement efforts (Upping the Anti, n.d), from Global South CP perspectives (Daher et al, 2020; Seedat, 2015; Stevens et al, 2013), and from other disciplines (Del Tufo et al, 2020; Flyvbjerg, 1998) with scholars who are also deeply theorizing about transformation. Collaboration is something that CPists have capacity and skills for, as it remains one of the core competencies of the field (Competencies for Community Psychology Practice, n.d.).…”

Section: Discussion: a Critical Read Of The Descriptive Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Toward a community psychology transformative praxis: A descriptive review

Kivell

Sharma

Ranco

et al. 2022

Journal Community Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this paper, we present a descriptive review of the foundational components of transformation—the starting places and gaps—in a move toward synthesizing current works into a Community Psychology Transformative Praxis. This review focuses on published work identified in North American Community Psychology journals (namely two United States based journals)—a review from the belly of the neoliberal and imperial beast. We reviewed and categorized seven foundational dimensions for beginning and sustaining transformative praxis and which represent how Community Psychology (CP), in the United States publishing context, is engaging in transformative efforts. In Part 1, we present three dimensions of transformative process, focused on early and iterative practices that develop and enact shared (1) values, (2) visions of a just world, and (3) critical problem frames. In part 2 we present four additional dimensions of transformative action; the considerations that inform action in a given transformative process or intervention including (4) planning for the long‐term nature of transformation, (5) targeting multiple levels of analysis, (6) engaging in solidarity with those most impacted by injustice, and (7) identifying and resisting power holders and/or power structures that prevent transformation and maintain the status quo. In Part 3, we review the relationship between process and action, where processes can be understood as driving, directing, and bounding the types of actions or interventions taken or imagined in a particular transformative intervention. We close the paper with critical reflections and calls to action to further develop the transformative potential of CP praxis and name the tendency of settling for ameliorative solutions to problems needing transformative solutions.

show abstract