The Power Dynamics of Friendship: Between- and Within- Person Associations among Friend Dominance, Self-Esteem, and Adolescent Internalizing Symptoms

Abstract

Although forming close, egalitarian peer relationships is a central developmental task of adolescence, little is known about the psychological consequences of power imbalances in adolescents' friendships. The current study investigated whether there are psychological costs of feeling subordinate to friends by examining longitudinal associations between adolescents' perceived friend dominance and internalizing symptoms. Across one year, five waves of survey data were collected from 388 adolescents (M age = 14.05, SD age = 0.41; 61% female; 46% White, 19% Black, 17% Asian, 6% Arab, Middle Eastern, North African, 6% Biracial/Multiethnic, 3% Latinx/Hispanic, 1% American Indian/Native American, 1% identifying with another race/ethnicity, <1% not reporting). Multilevel modeling disentangled between-and within-person effects of perceived friend dominance on depressive and anxiety (internalizing) symptoms and tested self-esteem as a mediator. The results indicated that both individual differences and intraindividual fluctuations in perceived friend dominance were associated with internalizing symptoms. At the between-person level, adolescents who perceived their friends as more dominant reported more severe depressive and anxiety symptoms than adolescents who perceived their friends as less dominant. At the withinperson level, increases in perceived friend dominance were accompanied by increases in depressive and anxiety symptoms, and these associations were partially explained by changes in self-esteem. The findings advance understanding of power dynamics in adolescents' close friendships and highlight the psychological toll of feeling dominated by friends.

Exploring career decision-making anxiety among high school students

“…First, there has been an upsurge in academic demands, encompassing tougher coursework, standardized testing pressures, and expectations for self-directed learning (Nguyen-Thi et al, 2024). Second, social dynamics underwent a shift, necessitating navigation through new social hierarchies, forging fresh friendships, and potentially encountering heightened social comparisons among peers (Schacter et al, 2023). Additionally, the onset of serious college and career exploration in tenth grade could induce anxiety as students grapple with doubts concerning their academic prowess, interests, and future prospects.…”

The Boomerang Effect of Suppression of Emotional Expression: Relationship Power, Affectivity and Adolescent and Youth Male-To-Female Dating Violence

“…This dynamic implies power imbalances in the relationship and the regulation of affects derived from these tensions and conflicts. Power in relationships is particularly significant during adolescence when status hierarchies are ubiquitous and influence psychological adjustment (Schacter et al, 2023 ). Likewise, many studies have focused on the role of negative affectivity in predicting dating violence (Armenti & Babcock, 2018 ).…”

“I don’t want to follow the pack”: Canadian adolescents’ lived experiences of silence and quietude among friends and family

“…">IntroductionThe slippery and unstable psychological landscapes and emotional geographies of relationships in adolescence involve an ambiguous mixture of talking and listening with one's family and friends (Hargreaves, 2001). With the importance of relationship re-structuring in adolescence, communication and social power (dominance) dynamics with friends and family plays a vital role in an adolescent's life (Guo et al, 2023;Moore et al, 2023;Schacter et al, 2023). While social communication is important for self-growth and well-being in adolescence (Han et al, 2023), little is known about how teenagers feel when they are talking, listening or silent in their interpersonal interactions (Bowker et al, 2023;Thomas & Bowker, 2015).…”