2011
DOI: 10.1080/03585522.2011.572585
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The poverty of solidarity: the size and structure of informal income smoothing among worker households in Helsinki, 1928

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While remittances existed, the transfers recorded in the survey were tiny compared to contributions from coresident children, even if the burden of grown children to household consumption is considered. For the 24 % of worker households receiving transfers in cash from any source-including but not limited to remittances from adult children-the mean receipt was FIM 573, which was about 11 % of the mean positive contribution from children living with the family (for an analysis of informal transfers in Helsinki in the same data, see Saaritsa 2008bSaaritsa , 2011. Figure 3 tracks the presence of working-age children (ages 15-29) of both sexes in households by social group and the contribution of children as ratio to total expenditure (right axis), against household head age using locally weighted scatterplot smoothing (cf.…”
Section: Expected Returnsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While remittances existed, the transfers recorded in the survey were tiny compared to contributions from coresident children, even if the burden of grown children to household consumption is considered. For the 24 % of worker households receiving transfers in cash from any source-including but not limited to remittances from adult children-the mean receipt was FIM 573, which was about 11 % of the mean positive contribution from children living with the family (for an analysis of informal transfers in Helsinki in the same data, see Saaritsa 2008bSaaritsa , 2011. Figure 3 tracks the presence of working-age children (ages 15-29) of both sexes in households by social group and the contribution of children as ratio to total expenditure (right axis), against household head age using locally weighted scatterplot smoothing (cf.…”
Section: Expected Returnsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…State share of female students was41 % in 1920-1921, slightly over 43 % in 1927-1928 and 44 % in 1937-1938 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Following in their footsteps, other scholars have used historical household budgets to study a range of themes. These include diet and nutrition (Vecchi and Coppola, 2006;Logan, 2006Logan, , 2009Gazeley and Horrell, 2013;Gazeley and Newell, 2015;Lundh, 2013), inequality and poverty (Rossi et al 2001, Amendola andVecchi, 2016), intra-household dynamics (Horrell and Oxley, 2013;Saaritsa and Kaihovaara, 2016;Scott, Walker and Miskell, 2015;Guyer, 1980), labor force participation (Baines and Johnson, 1999), child labor (Moehling, 2001(Moehling, , 2005, consumption behavior (Scott and Walker, 2012;Lilja and Bäcklund, 2013), agriculture and home-production (Federico, 1986(Federico, , 1991, economies of scale and child well-being (Hatton and Martin, 2010;Logan, 2011), and informal transfers of cash and goods between households (Saaritsa, 2008(Saaritsa, , 2011.…”
Section: Household Budgets In Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Japanese private pawnshops, which date back to the Kamakura period (1185–333), were the primary financial institutions for poor people in the early twentieth century. They were common even in the 1920s, in contrast to the decline of pawnbroking in European countries (Saarista 2011, p. 107; Scott and Walker 2012, p. 798; Murhem 2016). In fact, there were more than 17,000 pawnshops and approximately 25 million pawnshop loans were provided per year.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Against this background, many studies have examined how low-income people coped with risks such as a sudden earnings shock in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Previous literature has highlighted the importance of informal transfers and assistance between relatives, friends and neighbors (Kiesling 1996; Horrell and Oxley 2000; Saaritsa 2008, 2011). However, little is known about whether financial institutions that provided loans for low-income people served as a risk-coping device.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%