Fundamental Issues in Archaeology
DOI: 10.1007/0-306-47166-3_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Pottery Neolithic Period

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Pre-Pottery Neolithic C (PPNC, 8,100-7,600 uncal bp) was a short transitional period, which is associated with the gradual decline of the PPNB, possibly due to overexploitation of resources (Galili et al, 2005). The Pottery Neolithic period (PN, 7,600-7,000 uncal bp) marks the end of a transformation from a hunter-gatherer socioeconomic system to a fully agricultural economy, the introduction of pottery, and the end of hunting (Orrelle and Gopher, 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Pre-Pottery Neolithic C (PPNC, 8,100-7,600 uncal bp) was a short transitional period, which is associated with the gradual decline of the PPNB, possibly due to overexploitation of resources (Galili et al, 2005). The Pottery Neolithic period (PN, 7,600-7,000 uncal bp) marks the end of a transformation from a hunter-gatherer socioeconomic system to a fully agricultural economy, the introduction of pottery, and the end of hunting (Orrelle and Gopher, 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both types of data suggest endogamy within this LPPNB ‘megasite’, thus limiting the potential of employing isotopic evidence to document bridewealth. Beyond isotopes—and more speculatively—some have suggested that clay figurines depicting horned bovids and women from Pre-Pottery and Pottery Neolithic sites might relate to bridewealth (Orrelle & Gopher 2000, 304; Russell 2012, 338), although such figurines may have alternatively been used in hunting magic or as toys (Rollefson 2008).…”
Section: The Case For Wealth In Livestock In the Lppnbmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many theories that are based on the change in the diet as the main factor in the reduction of the masticatory complex in humans [ 12 , 15 , 20 ]. With the discovery of the fact that the development of dental germs and their differentiation into different functional groups (incisors, canines, premolars, molars) is under the control of signal molecules that are stimulated by different genes, two theories are formed: “Space theory” was proposed by Butler [ 5 ] and developed by Dahlberg [ 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%