2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2017.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Potential Value of Preoperative MRI Texture and Shape Analysis in Grading Meningiomas: A Preliminary Investigation

Abstract: OBJECT: Preoperative knowledge of meningioma grade is essential for planning treatment and surgery. The purpose of this study was to investigate the diagnostic value of MRI texture and shape analysis in grading meningiomas. METHODS: A surgical database was reviewed to identify meningioma patients who had undergone tumor resection between January 2015 and December 2016. Preoperative MR images were retrieved and analyzed. Texture and shape analysis was conducted to quantitatively evaluate tumor heterogeneity and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
41
1
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
41
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In breast cancer, texture analysis could discriminate between lobular and ductal breast carcinomas [20] . In another recent study, it could discriminate between benign and malignant meningiomas [21] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In breast cancer, texture analysis could discriminate between lobular and ductal breast carcinomas [20] . In another recent study, it could discriminate between benign and malignant meningiomas [21] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Previous studies have used classifiers for the detection and grading of meningiomas and other CNS tumors, but these have almost exclusively focused on MRI 28,29 or histopathological 30 imaging characteristics to drive their predictions. We also extend classical survival analysis methods to the machine learning framework and demonstrate how proportional hazard ratios can be used to create individualized patient-specific survival curves (also illustrated in Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, our results and conclusions should be interpreted with potential selection and information biases in mind. It should also be noted that the accuracy of the predictive models we develop are not perfect, and would be improved by increasing the number of patients in the study and the addition of radiomic or biologic features, as has been demonstrated by other investigators for prediction of meningioma grade [ 10 , 23 ]. Indeed, the magnetic resonance characteristics of meningiomas have high sensitivity and specificity for meningioma grade and histopathologic subtype [ 24 , 25 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%