2022
DOI: 10.3917/jie.pr1.0104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Potential Use of Blockchain Technology in Co-creation Ecosystems

Abstract: Distribution électronique Cairn.info pour De Boeck Supérieur. © De Boeck Supérieur. Tous droits réservés pour tous pays.La reproduction ou représentation de cet article, notamment par photocopie, n'est autorisée que dans les limites des conditions générales d'utilisation du site ou, le cas échéant, des conditions générales de la licence souscrite par votre établissement. Toute autre reproduction ou représentation, en tout ou partie, sous quelque forme et de quelque manière que ce soit, est interdite sauf accor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Governments can also hinder commoning through overregulation (Feliciantonio, 2017) or by co-opting citizen action (Cooke et al, 2020). The diversity of participants in urban and digital commoning requires expectations and emotions to be managed, and if commoning is poorly moderated competitive and conflictual dynamics among participants may arise (Kondrateva et al, 2022). This can lead to exclusionary practices in cities where the rights of some city dwellers come up against the property rights of others (Colding and Barthel, 2013; Esser, 2013), leading some to feel overshadowed or neglected.…”
Section: Trouble In Paradise? the Urban Commons A Tragedy In Three Partsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Governments can also hinder commoning through overregulation (Feliciantonio, 2017) or by co-opting citizen action (Cooke et al, 2020). The diversity of participants in urban and digital commoning requires expectations and emotions to be managed, and if commoning is poorly moderated competitive and conflictual dynamics among participants may arise (Kondrateva et al, 2022). This can lead to exclusionary practices in cities where the rights of some city dwellers come up against the property rights of others (Colding and Barthel, 2013; Esser, 2013), leading some to feel overshadowed or neglected.…”
Section: Trouble In Paradise? the Urban Commons A Tragedy In Three Partsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much like a blockchain ensures that a system of values and exchanges is secured against individual acts of alteration, it can also safeguard vital public spaces. Blockchain-based DLTs reduce transaction costs (Kondrateva et al, 2022). Smart contracts—small sections of code which can be inserted into a blockchain have the benefit of being automatically executed, which reduces monitoring and oversight costs.…”
Section: Institutional Design For the Digital Urban Commons: Dlts To ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the experts’ indication of the efficiency of data structures as the fifth option with the lowest importance on the scale in Table 7 may indicate the participants’ lack of understanding of this potentiality of the use of tokenization to generate good quality information for the auditing purpose. The storage of data in blocks where the recorded data confirm the authenticity of the previous recorded ones can be viewed as the greatest potentiality for the reliability of data in blockchain and elevates tokenization as the future of co-creation (Kondrateva et al , 2022).…”
Section: Design/development and Demonstrationmentioning
confidence: 99%