2002
DOI: 10.1207/s15326934crj1434_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Potential Role of the Physical Environment in Fostering Creativity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
154
1
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 240 publications
(178 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
8
154
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Alencar & Bruno-Faria (1997) report that an agreeable physical environment with adequate light, furniture, space and ventilation can stimulate creativity, whereas an environment with noise, heat, insufficient illumination, and lack of space inhibits creativity. McCoy & Evans (2002) identify physical features in educational environments with low and high creativity potential, and Ceylan, Dul & Aytac (2008) conduct a similar analysis of managers' offices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Alencar & Bruno-Faria (1997) report that an agreeable physical environment with adequate light, furniture, space and ventilation can stimulate creativity, whereas an environment with noise, heat, insufficient illumination, and lack of space inhibits creativity. McCoy & Evans (2002) identify physical features in educational environments with low and high creativity potential, and Ceylan, Dul & Aytac (2008) conduct a similar analysis of managers' offices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Outside viewing from a window may create a positive mood (Hedge, 1982) and encourage creative task performance (Shibata and Suzuki, 2002). McCoy and Evans (2002) in their study also suggested that visual complexity (presence of many objects and furniture) can motivate creativity and enhance social interaction in a workplace, but, some other studies opposed these findings and suggested that crowded places may decrease privacy and negatively affect social interaction and creativity (Stokols et al, 2002;Sundstrom et al, 1982).…”
Section: The Role Of Physical Work Environment On Individual and Orgamentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For instance, Amabile (1996) explained that physical workspaces which were designed to be motivating can promote the level of creativity; however this effect is not stronger than other aspects of the work environment such as social environment. Previous studies from different perspectives have shown that the perceived quality of the physical work environment influence people creativity (see for example: McCoy and Evans, 2002;Vithayathawornwong et al, 2003;Vischer, 2007;Oksanen and Ståhle, 2013). In fact, previous studies indicated the direct or indirect role of certain features of the physical work environment on creativity via mood (Hedge, 1982;Larsen et al, 1998;Shibata and Suzuki, 2004).…”
Section: The Role Of Physical Work Environment On Individual and Orgamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nakakoji, Yamamoto, and Ohira (1999) also used visual images, but to develop creative computer system design. Meanwhile, a study by McCoy and Evans (2002) used physical environment images that enhanced creativity. A study by Harland and Coren (2001) consistently, found that poor visual acuity and stereopsis may reduce creative task-solving because the effectiveness of imagery in achieving novel solutions is reduced when stored images are lacking in detail.…”
Section: Visual Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%