Objective
To evaluate adherence to perioperative processes of care associated with major cancer resections.
Summary Background Data
Mortality rates associated with major cancer resections vary across hospitals. Because mechanisms underlying such variations are not well established, we studied adherence to perioperative care processes.
Methods
1,279 hospitals participating in the National Cancer DataBase (2005-2006) were ranked on a composite measure of mortality for bladder, colon, esophagus, stomach, lung and pancreas cancer operations. We sampled hospitals from among those with the lowest and highest mortality rates, 19 low mortality hospitals (LMHs, risk-adjusted mortality rate 2.84%) and 30 high mortality hospitals (HMHs, risk-adjusted mortality rate 7.37%). We then conducted onsite chart reviews. Using logistic regression we examined differences in perioperative care, adjusting for patient and tumor characteristics.
Results
Compared to LMHs, HMHs were less likely to use prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism, either preoperative or postoperatively (aRR 0.74, 95%CI 0.50-0.92 and aRR 0.80, 95%CI 0.56-0.93, respectively). The two hospital groups were indistinguishable with respect to processes aimed at preventing surgical site infections, such as the use of antibiotics prior to incision (aRR 0.99, 95%CI 0.90-1.04), and processes intended to prevent cardiac events, including use of β-blockers (1.00, 95%CI 0.81-1.14). HMHs were significantly less likely to use epidurals (aRR 0.57, 95%CI 0.32-0.93).
Conclusions
HMHs and LMHs differ in several aspects of perioperative care. These areas may represent opportunities for improving cancer surgery quality at hospitals with high mortality.