“…There were four reasons for this approach: First, there is a substantial body of evidence supporting the effectiveness of taped interviews of upper level students for shifting more novice students’ causal attributions for adversity experienced in academic contexts (e.g., Menec, Perry, Struthers, Schonwetter, Hechter, & Eichholz, 1994; Wilson & Linville, 1982; see Table 1 in Wilson, Damiani, & Shelton, 2002). Second, the audiovisual modality might be more effective at conveying social information, particularly with adolescent audiences, because videos offer a wider range of emotional and social information than does pure text, they stimulate motivation and attention, and they boost recall (Elias & Maher, 1983; Harwood & Weissberg, 1987). Third, text-only materials run the risk of being perceived as just another class assignment, triggering frustration in students, especially those with a history of poor academic performance (Finn, 1989).…”