2019
DOI: 10.1080/00472778.2019.1659672
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The potential of internal social capital in organizations: An assessment of past research and suggestions for the future

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 177 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is seen as advancements in theory, which strongly respond to calls from prior studies by other researchers (e.g. Gomez-Limon et al, 2014;Xu et al, 2018;Chmel ıkov a et al, 2019;Sanchez-Famoso et al, 2020). This new measurement will be very useful for studies that apply the theories of SC, human resources or intellectual capital.…”
Section: Effect Of Social Capital On Agribusinessmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This result is seen as advancements in theory, which strongly respond to calls from prior studies by other researchers (e.g. Gomez-Limon et al, 2014;Xu et al, 2018;Chmel ıkov a et al, 2019;Sanchez-Famoso et al, 2020). This new measurement will be very useful for studies that apply the theories of SC, human resources or intellectual capital.…”
Section: Effect Of Social Capital On Agribusinessmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…For example, some aspects of SC applied include bonding and bridging dimensions (Morrow et al, 2017;Xu et al, 2018), bonding, bridging and linking dimensions (Cofr e-Bravo et al, 2019), trust (Coleman, 1988), relationships as network ties (Seghers et al, 2012), rules and norms governing social actions (Coleman, 1988;Fukuyama, 2001), informal or formal social ties, trust, norms of collective action (Calcagnini and Perugini, 2019), strong and weak ties of SC (Pirolo and Presutti, 2010), social interactions, trust, shared vision and involvement of local institutions (Molina-Morales and Mart ınez-Fern andez, 2010). In brief, from recent calls by Xu et al (2018), Chmel ıkov a et al Sanchez-Famoso et al (2020) about the growing need to develop an integrative measurement scale of SC that captures its complexity, this study intends to develop a new integrated measurement that should be explored in the agribusiness before investigating its full effect on psychological factors relating to diversifying agribusiness.…”
Section: Effect Of Social Capital On Agribusinessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Besides, social capital is measured through its three dimensions, seen as three social capital types (Lang et al, 2021b). Structural social capital refers to networks' interaction and structural features (Sanchez-Famoso et al, 2020) and defined as "the patterns and strength of ties between the members of a group" (Nahapiet and Ghoshal, 1998, p. 244). CSC refers to perceived shared norms (Liao and Welsch, 2005) as resources providing "shared representations, interpretations, and systems of meaning among parties, which reflects the members' collective of the organization's culture, shared vision and purpose, common language and codes" (Nahapiet and Ghoshal, 1998, p. 244).…”
Section: Social Capital Theory and The Extended Theory Of Planned Beh...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Directors with a high level of internal capital are more likely to have a longer board tenure, and collectivity cohesiveness is prioritised when making decisions (Adler & Kwon, 2002). When the collective goals, in most cases the firm's survival, are not jeopardised, directors are hesitant to change (Sanchez‐Famoso et al, 2020). In our case, the returns of cleaner production eco‐innovation are uncertain, and projects are at high risk (Pan et al, 2021).…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%