2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.sedgeo.2017.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The potential of detrital garnet as a provenance proxy in the Central Swiss Alps

Abstract: Detrital garnet is a promising candidate to reliably fingerprint sediment sources in the Alps, which has so far been complicated by the wide range and similarity of some of the lithologies. Garnet is present in most Alpine sediments, is easy to identify, is fairly stable and, most importantly, reflects the type and the metamorphic grade of its source rock in its chemical composition. This study aims to establish fingerprints based on detrital garnet composition for the most important tectonic units of the Cent… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The exhumation of large slices of mid-crustal rocks from the European plate, the so-called external crystalline massifs, occurred relatively late in the Alpine evolution, probably during the late Miocene, although the exact timing is not well constrained. The external crystalline massifs are today characterized by high relief, intense glaciation, and some of the highest denudation rates in the Alps (up to 1.4 mm yr −1 ), which all contribute to their relevance as a sediment source (Kühni and Pfiffner, 2001;Wittmann et al, 2007;Stutenbecker et al, 2018). The exhumation is discussed as being related to crustal delamination in response to lithospheric mantle rollback (Herwegh et al, 2017), slab detachment (Fox et al, 2015), or erosional unloading (Champagnac et al, 2009), possibly due to increased precipitation rates in the Pliocene (Cederbom et al, 2004) or enhanced glacial erosion in the Pleistocene (Fox et al, 2015;Herman et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exhumation of large slices of mid-crustal rocks from the European plate, the so-called external crystalline massifs, occurred relatively late in the Alpine evolution, probably during the late Miocene, although the exact timing is not well constrained. The external crystalline massifs are today characterized by high relief, intense glaciation, and some of the highest denudation rates in the Alps (up to 1.4 mm yr −1 ), which all contribute to their relevance as a sediment source (Kühni and Pfiffner, 2001;Wittmann et al, 2007;Stutenbecker et al, 2018). The exhumation is discussed as being related to crustal delamination in response to lithospheric mantle rollback (Herwegh et al, 2017), slab detachment (Fox et al, 2015), or erosional unloading (Champagnac et al, 2009), possibly due to increased precipitation rates in the Pliocene (Cederbom et al, 2004) or enhanced glacial erosion in the Pleistocene (Fox et al, 2015;Herman et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While 15 geochemically distinct compositional end-members can be found in nature, there are 6 types that commonly form solid solutions, namely (in descending order of their abundance): almandine (Fe 3 Al 2 Si 3 O 12 ), spessartine (Mn 3 Al 2 Si 3 O 12 ), pyrope (Mg 3 Al 2 Si 3 O 12 ), grossular (Ca 3 Al 2 Si 3 O 12 ), andradite (Ca 3 (Fe,Ti) 2 Si 3 O 12 ), and uvarovite (Ca 3 Cr 2 Si 3 O 12 ). Garnets are usually formed in metamorphic rocks and it is the metamorphic history (temperature and pressure conditions) along with composition of the source rock that defines garnet geochemistry and, therefore, the end-member type (Krippner et al, 2014; Alizai et al, 2016; Stutenbecker et al, 2016). These source rock diagnostic geochemical characteristics combined with their rarity in igneous rock (von Eynatten and Dunkl, 2012) enable identification of the metamorphic setting, and make them very useful in provenance studies (Morton, 1991; Morton et al, 2004, 2011; Mange and Morton, 2007; Andò et al, 2013; Suggate and Hall, 2013; Krippner et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This appears fully justified because almost all chemical data used in this paper (both database and examples) are obtained by wave-length dispersive electron microprobe (EMP) techniques, which are very precise with respect to the elements considered. If the data to be analysed are obtained by other, less precise techniques (for comparison of, e.g., SEM-EDX vs. EMP see for instance Stutenbecker et al, 2017), the uncertainties with the calculated probabilities will be much higher, which is especially relevant if the decision of assigning a garnet to a specific group is somewhat ambiguous.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%