Integrating Ecology and Poverty Reduction 2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-0186-5_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Potential of Carbon Offsetting Projects in the Forestry Sector for Poverty Reduction in Developing Countries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The implementation of carbon sink plantation projects is an important way to reduce poverty and prevent economically underdeveloped areas from returning to poverty [21][22][23][24]. Carbon sink plantation projects can improve the ecological environment, thereby directly reducing the risk of poverty to farmers caused by natural disasters and improving the local ability to resist harsh natural environments or natural disasters [25].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The implementation of carbon sink plantation projects is an important way to reduce poverty and prevent economically underdeveloped areas from returning to poverty [21][22][23][24]. Carbon sink plantation projects can improve the ecological environment, thereby directly reducing the risk of poverty to farmers caused by natural disasters and improving the local ability to resist harsh natural environments or natural disasters [25].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Local communities are key stakeholders in the effort to address land degradation, with local knowledge enabling context-dependent solutions that prioritise the agency of communitymembers in decision-making 6 . Carbon markets are a funding mechanism for environmental restoration 7 with potentially powerful benefits for participating communities 8 . However, successful restoration projects are often localised, limited in scalability and the impacts of grass-roots actions in rural areas are under-quantified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%