2023
DOI: 10.1007/s10668-023-03460-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The potential of bamboo forests as a carbon sink and allometric equations for estimating their aboveground biomass

Abstract: Bamboo forests in Colombia and the Andean region of South America represent high-value ecosystems that provide ecological and economic benefits with local and global impacts. One of the ecosystem services provided by these forests is associated with their capacity to store carbon. In this study, data collected from monitoring plots were used to estimate the carbon content in different pools. Bamboo biomass (Bba), tree biomass (Btree), litter (Cli) and soil organic carbon (SOC) were assessed. The approximate to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 38 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, a Guadua culm represents 67% of the Guadua's plant biomass [34], and it is also estimated that from each Guadua in the forest, an average of 12 m (lineal metres) of round Guadua or Guadua mats can be used for construction (Table 6). The balance shows that thanks to the CO 2 captured in the growth process of the GaK, the carbon footprint of the GaKB house decreases by 10%, equivalent to 11.88 CO 2 /m 2 (Table 7), which leads to the final comparison of the carbon footprint (Figure 9).…”
Section: Carbon Footprint Balancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, a Guadua culm represents 67% of the Guadua's plant biomass [34], and it is also estimated that from each Guadua in the forest, an average of 12 m (lineal metres) of round Guadua or Guadua mats can be used for construction (Table 6). The balance shows that thanks to the CO 2 captured in the growth process of the GaK, the carbon footprint of the GaKB house decreases by 10%, equivalent to 11.88 CO 2 /m 2 (Table 7), which leads to the final comparison of the carbon footprint (Figure 9).…”
Section: Carbon Footprint Balancementioning
confidence: 99%