The potential link between sense of agency and output monitoring over speech

Sugimori, Eriko; Asai, Tomohisa; Tanno, Yoshihiko

doi:10.1016/j.concog.2012.07.010

Cited by 14 publications

(22 citation statements)

References 52 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Daprati et al, 2003;Ditman & Kuperberg, 2005;Sugimori et al, 2011Sugimori et al, , 2013. These findings generally confirm that some online monitoring of sensorimotor feedback influences memory of produced forms.…”

Section: Results and Discussion: Memory Of Produced Wordssupporting

confidence: 75%

“…1: memory of produced words is better when words are spoken aloud to someone than when they are lip-synched or covertly produced (see Daprati et al, 2003;Ditman & Kuperberg, 2005;Sugimori et al, 2011Sugimori et al, , 2013. With respect to previous self-monitoring studies, Sugimori et al (2011) had found that speakers' memory of produced words did not differ for forms spoken aloud and forms that were lip-synched during a loud masking noise.…”

Section: General Discussion and Conclusionmentioning

confidence: 97%

“…In fact, investigations of these differential effects are relatively rare. However, several reports involving tasks of self-monitoring suggest that different sensory modalities do have variable effects on memory of spoken forms (Daprati et al, 2003;Ditman & Kuperberg, 2005;Sugimori et al, 2011Sugimori et al, , 2013. In this work, participants produce words by speaking aloud, lip-synching, or they imagine producing the words, and after a distractor task, they are asked to identify in a list items that were produced aloud.…”

Section: Unexamined Implications Of Cmt On the Learning Of Verbal Formentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This view is implicit in studies of agency over speech where effects of sensory feedback are examined via tasks of verbal self-monitoring that involve producing words aloud, silently, or under conditions of altered auditory feedback (e.g., Cahill, Silbersweig, & Frith, 1996;Christoffels et al, 2011;Fu et al, 2006;Goldberg, Gold, Coppola, & Weinberger, 1997;Johns & McGuire, 1999;Sugimori et al, 2011;Sugimori, Asai, & Tanno, 2013). Yet, speech is a social act and these studies overlook a body of work attesting to the effects of speaker-listener interaction on the learning of verbal forms.…”

Section: Unexamined Implications Of Cmt On the Learning Of Verbal Formentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

The ecology of self-monitoring effects on memory of verbal productions: Does speaking to someone make a difference?

Lafleur

Boucher

2015

Consciousness and Cognition

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Results and Discussion: Memory Of Produced Wordssupporting

confidence: 75%

Section: General Discussion and Conclusionmentioning

confidence: 97%

Section: Unexamined Implications Of Cmt On the Learning Of Verbal Formentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Unexamined Implications Of Cmt On the Learning Of Verbal Formentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

The ecology of self-monitoring effects on memory of verbal productions: Does speaking to someone make a difference?

Lafleur

Boucher

2015

Consciousness and Cognition

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…H. Chen, Liu, Xu, & Larson, 2007; Z. Chen et al, 2013;Liu, Meshman, Behroozmand, & Larson, 2011;Sitek et al, 2013;Sugimori, Asai, & Tanno, 2013). Abnormalities in the detection of self-generated voice feedback during speech production disrupt verbal communication processes (Lane & Webster, 1991;Moeller et al, 2007;Oller & Eilers, 1988;Schauwers et al, 2004).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The effects of stimulus complexity on the preattentive processing of self-generated and nonself voices: An ERP study

Conde

Gonçalves

Pinheiro

2015

Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The ability to differentiate one's own voice from the voice of somebody else plays a critical role in successful verbal self-monitoring processes and in communication. However, most of the existing studies have only focused on the sensory correlates of self-generated voice processing, whereas the effects of attentional demands and stimulus complexity on self-generated voice processing remain largely unknown. In this study, we investigated the effects of stimulus complexity on the preattentive processing of self and nonself voice stimuli. Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded from 17 healthy males who watched a silent movie while ignoring prerecorded self-generated (SGV) and nonself (NSV) voice stimuli, consisting of a vocalization (vocalization category condition: VCC) or of a disyllabic word (word category condition: WCC). All voice stimuli were presented as standard and deviant events in four distinct oddball sequences. The mismatch negativity (MMN) ERP component peaked earlier for NSV than for SGV stimuli. Moreover, when compared with SGV stimuli, the P3a amplitude was increased for NSV stimuli in the VCC only, whereas in the WCC no significant differences were found between the two voice types. These findings suggest differences in the time course of automatic detection of a change in voice identity. In addition, they suggest that stimulus complexity modulates the magnitude of the orienting response to SGV and NSV stimuli, extending previous findings on self-voice processing.

show abstract

Agency elicits body-ownership: proprioceptive drift toward a synchronously acting external proxy

Asai

2015

Exp Brain Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Awareness of our own bodies (sense of body-ownership) and actions (sense of agency) is fundamental for self-consciousness. In the rubber hand illusion, watching a rubber hand being stroked synchronously as one's own unseen hand is also stroked causes the observer to attribute the rubber hand to their own body. The findings of the series of experiments reported here suggest that body-ownership, measured using proprioceptive drift, is elicited by the external acting proxy that drives the sense of agency. While participants clasped and unclasped their left hand for 60 s, they focused on video feedback on a monitor in front of them. Proprioceptive drift was observed only under the conditions, including synchronized conditions, where the sense of agency for the acting proxy occurred, suggesting an essential interaction between body-ownership and agency.

show abstract

The potential link between sense of agency and output monitoring over speech

Cited by 14 publications

References 52 publications

The ecology of self-monitoring effects on memory of verbal productions: Does speaking to someone make a difference?

The ecology of self-monitoring effects on memory of verbal productions: Does speaking to someone make a difference?

The effects of stimulus complexity on the preattentive processing of self-generated and nonself voices: An ERP study

Agency elicits body-ownership: proprioceptive drift toward a synchronously acting external proxy

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About