2014
DOI: 10.1111/jeb.12471
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The potential influence of morphology on the evolutionary divergence of an acoustic signal

Abstract: The evolution of acoustic behaviour and that of the morphological traits mediating its production are often coupled. Lack of variation in the underlying morphology of signalling traits has the potential to constrain signal evolution. This relationship is particularly likely in field crickets, where males produce acoustic advertisement signals to attract females by stridulating with specialized structures on their forewings. In this study, we characterise the size and geometric shape of the forewings of males f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Both traits were targets of sexual selection, but the form of selection differed between them, and also between two populations (Veltsos et al 2011). Pitchers et al (2014) found that wing morphology and acoustic signal properties covaried with differing strength in different populations of this species, but that overall covariance was minimal and appeared unrelated to patterns of population divergence. Pitchers et al (2014) found that wing morphology and acoustic signal properties covaried with differing strength in different populations of this species, but that overall covariance was minimal and appeared unrelated to patterns of population divergence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Both traits were targets of sexual selection, but the form of selection differed between them, and also between two populations (Veltsos et al 2011). Pitchers et al (2014) found that wing morphology and acoustic signal properties covaried with differing strength in different populations of this species, but that overall covariance was minimal and appeared unrelated to patterns of population divergence. Pitchers et al (2014) found that wing morphology and acoustic signal properties covaried with differing strength in different populations of this species, but that overall covariance was minimal and appeared unrelated to patterns of population divergence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…In a similar study, Veltsos et al (2011) simultaneously estimated sexual selection on male calling song and olfactory profiles in the fruit fly Drosophila montana. A recent study tested the relationship between acoustic signals in a sister species of field cricket, Teleogryllus commodus, and morphological features of male forewings that contribute to their resonant properties (Pitchers et al 2014). A recent study tested the relationship between acoustic signals in a sister species of field cricket, Teleogryllus commodus, and morphological features of male forewings that contribute to their resonant properties (Pitchers et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Not surprisingly, centroid size and dominant frequency negatively covaried, such that as the size of the tegmen increased, the area of the harp increased and correspondingly the frequency of the song decreased (Table ). The negative correlation between harp size and dominant frequency has been found in a large number of orthopteran taxa (Simmons, ; Simmons & Ritchie, ; Pitchers et al ., ). Pulse duration positively covaried with centroid size in both top and bottom tegmina (Table ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In conclusion, we show that wing morphology has an important influence on song structure in C. strepitans and is subject to significant linear and nonlinear sexual selection through female precopulatory mate choice. Although numerous studies have documented the strength and form of sexual selection targeting song characteristics in crickets (Brooks et al ., ; Bentsen et al ., ; Oh & Shaw, ; Ower et al ., ), relatively few studies have examined the pattern of selection on wing morphology (Pitchers et al ., ), especially in wild populations. As song production is both a product of behaviour and the underlying morphology of the wing, understanding the link between morphology and behaviour is likely to have important implications for how song structure evolves.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%