1999
DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.1999.430209.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The potential for increased risk of infection due to the reuse of convective air‐warming/cooling coverlets

Abstract: This study demonstrates that the use of the coverlets, intra- or postoperatively, can lead to significant bacterial contamination. It is concluded that it is not advisable to reuse coverlets for multiple clinical applications.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike forced-air warming, there is no consumable associated with use of the heating pad, so the latter is cheaper in long-term use. For forced-air warming, the hose, the warming units and even the brand new commercial blankets have been shown to be potential sources of nosocomial infection [3][4][5]. The heating pad warming system, which comprises a control unit, an electric cable and a heating pad, has no hidden space for bacterial colonisation and is theoretically easier to clean.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike forced-air warming, there is no consumable associated with use of the heating pad, so the latter is cheaper in long-term use. For forced-air warming, the hose, the warming units and even the brand new commercial blankets have been shown to be potential sources of nosocomial infection [3][4][5]. The heating pad warming system, which comprises a control unit, an electric cable and a heating pad, has no hidden space for bacterial colonisation and is theoretically easier to clean.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The efficacy of forced‐air warming for maintaining normothermia has been well documented [8]. However, cost is a concern: the disposable blankets available costs more than UK£15 (€21; US$20) each and are not recommended for re‐use on another patient, the frequency of bacterial contamination tripling after single use [5]. Even if a brand new blanket is used on each patient, the problem is not eliminated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most commonly used method of active warming is forced‐air warming [3]. However, the warming units and even the brand new commercial blankets have been shown to be potential sources of nosocomial infection [4–6], with pathogenic organisms found in the interior of the hose, which is difficult to clean. The Operatherm 202 electric heating pad (KanMed, Bromma, Sweden) comprises a control unit, an electric cable and a heating pad.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other limitations include: the noise of the system, the cost of consumables e although no robust analysis between the two groups has been performed e and the potential risk of contamination from the pump and airhose system. 42 Resistive heat warming is based on resistive polymer technology. 43 The system is safe as it uses low-voltage DC currents passing through a semiconductive polymer fibre fabric with temperatures safely maintained by a central computer.…”
Section: Warming Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%