2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10336-013-0955-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The potential distribution of the Red Kite in Germany

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
35
1
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
35
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Positive response of these species to landscape heterogeneity is well documented in the literature (Buckingham et al ., ; Cornulier & Bretagnolle, ; Brambilla et al ., , ; Sirami et al ., ). The loss of grassland following the extension of maize was predicted to negatively affect Corn Bunting, Red Kite and Whinchat, which are typically associated with grassland habitats (Perkins et al ., ; Hoffmann et al ., ; Heuck et al ., ). Generally, maize management is intensive and includes more fertilizer and pesticides than other crops (Hötker et al ., ), which in turn reduces invertebrate abundance as a feeding source for farmland bird populations (Benton et al ., ; Boatman et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Positive response of these species to landscape heterogeneity is well documented in the literature (Buckingham et al ., ; Cornulier & Bretagnolle, ; Brambilla et al ., , ; Sirami et al ., ). The loss of grassland following the extension of maize was predicted to negatively affect Corn Bunting, Red Kite and Whinchat, which are typically associated with grassland habitats (Perkins et al ., ; Hoffmann et al ., ; Heuck et al ., ). Generally, maize management is intensive and includes more fertilizer and pesticides than other crops (Hötker et al ., ), which in turn reduces invertebrate abundance as a feeding source for farmland bird populations (Benton et al ., ; Boatman et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…for foraging or nesting; Brambilla and Saporetti 2014) or to benchmark established conservation concepts (such as the umbrella species concept, Fourcade et al 2017). More explicitly, the increasing availability of fine-scale information has helped conservationists to evaluate species-specific human impacts (Braunisch et al 2011, Coppes et al 2017 or to identify (potential) nest sites (Kassara et al 2011, Brambilla et al 2013, Heuck et al 2013. However, when such fine-scaled information is not available, downscaling information from coarser scales (such as from atlas data) could offer possible alternatives (but also poses new challenges; see Niamir et al 2011, Bombi and D'Amen 2012, Keil et al 2013Keil et al , 2014 for Figure 2.…”
Section: Identifying Priority Areas or Habitats For Conservationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BRTs is a machine-learning technique and builds on the concepts of decision trees and gradient boosting [39,48,49]. BRTs have recently gained popularity due to several advantages over traditional, frequentist statistical methods [50]. They offer high predictive accuracies and good interpretability of results, do not tend to overfit [51], are robust against missing data and collinearity of predictors, and are able to handle non-linearity and interaction effects [39,48,49].…”
Section: Boosted Regression Treesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The learning rate reduces the contribution of each single tree to the entire model and can be interpreted as a penalizing parameter. The number of trees determines the number of single decision trees included in the model and represents the model complexity [50,52].…”
Section: Boosted Regression Treesmentioning
confidence: 99%